And what is your party affiliation?
2007-06-01 08:38:53 · 25 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
GOP Princess: Then you have only ever dated married men, right? Because single men can't show commitment or stability?
Just curious.
2007-06-01 08:44:08 · update #1
"Dating" does not require a commitment. I didn't say "engaged to" multiple women, I said "dating."
2007-06-03 07:35:09 · update #2
Sure. Being single means that you have the right to date.
Conservative
2007-06-01 08:45:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
One of the Top Singles Dating network is: http://www.freedatingsitesinusa.us 100% free to be a member, my adventure online started from this singles dating website. Read my tip below.
The world wide web has created a world beyond what we could possibly comprehend. You'll find so many things that will happen online every moment. Online dating has created finding new friends and perhaps even the love of your life go beyond getting close up and front, and even beyond pen pals.
Here are great tips for you if you need to meeting single men or women via a date site.
Be sure of what you would like. This will let you determine which type of dating site 's best for you. Figure out whether you wish to meet someone because you would like to date them or to get friends first.
If you're the type who would like to be friends first, you can sign up on Social network sites which will let anyone meet people as pals. You can also try the Niche Paid dating sites which would let an individual meet people of widespread interests.
If you desire to find someone for the direct intent behind dating, try Online Paid dating sites such as singlesdating. people. These sites would help you browse through public profiles of everybody to be able to get to know them without contacting them, kind of like a notch above pace dating. You can in addition try Relationship sites of which match people through compatibility tests.
Remember to play the idea safe. Never put in specific details about yourself, especially personal info for instance address and contact numbers which can be viewed by everyone. In addition, be careful with your pictures because they might return to haunt you someday.
Employ recent photos of by yourself. You might potentially fulfill the person that you're dating online with, so be careful with your photographs. You do not want to upset them after you do get to meet 1 another via video chat or face to face.
2014-05-29 09:30:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes I would if he believed in the things I believe in and would do what is best for the country
some people don't get married and are content to serial date. there are also people who can't find someone to marry or be with long-term in a monogamous way.
its not an issue of respect. I know men who respect women and still serial date. I know one guy who thinks he's just too young to settle down- he's 40, he'll think about settling down at 60. he doesn't disrespect the women he dates, they know he loves kids in small frames of interaction, like when he takes his niece for a weekend. he doesn't have an issue with monogamy but doesn't like the idea of living with someone.
not marrying and dating doesn't mean you have a disrespect for the gender you are dating.
it might be better to have a single president who dates women and starts new relationships after the last one ends, than to have a fake marriage where he marrys a girl due to social pressure. he then might cheat or just be unhappy.
we don't want a depressed president.
I'm liberal, I vote for the best candidate. no party affiliation
2007-06-01 15:56:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be a strike against him.
I don't have a problem with single and dating one person. However, dating multiple women (are you saying simultaneously) just opens you up to unnecessary character attacks. It may be right or wrong, but now you are dealing with these issues and not dealing with the things you should be dealing with.
And leave GOP Princess alone!
Party: registered Republican, but an independent thinker.
2007-06-01 15:48:04 · answer #4 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If they seemed like they would make a good President I wouldn't care what they did,he can date multiple men for all I care. This has been one major flaw in the "Conservative" movement is this obsession with peoples personal habits. What should be important is what they will try to do to make our situation as a country better,nothing more.
Independent
AD
2007-06-01 15:56:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What does that have to do with a candidate? Nothing. I would vote for the person I feel is best qualified. Besides, Clinton was dating multiple women, and people loved him. (Maybe that's why?)
I am registered as a Republican because if you don't register as a Republican or a Democrat you can not vote in the primaries.
2007-06-01 15:44:29 · answer #6 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why not. We elected one who was married and dating multiple women.
2007-06-01 17:04:32 · answer #7 · answered by Billy M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer that to him dating multiple men. I am a Democrat leaning towards the right.
2007-06-01 15:48:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure what does his or her personal life have to do with anything
GOP princess did you just call Thomas Jefferson unstable? Our most intelligent President hands down and the one without whom there would be no Declaration of Independence?
OK there sweetie. What about Nixon you know that paranoid one who tried to over throw the constitution?
2007-06-01 15:45:09 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
In theory, as long as his philandering ways do not interfere with the official duties of the oval office, then I'd have no problem with it. In practice, it would not work out.
party affiliation: none
2007-06-01 15:49:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Simultaneously - or in a series of monogamous relationships handled with sobriety and seriousness?
My faith has more to do with my response question that my political party.
If he's out for "tail" his attention is too fleeting to regard as trustworthy in a position of authority. We have too many MARRIED "playa's" in government already. Without the ability to be faithful in their marriages - I have no trust in their ability to be faithful to their duties.
If he's genuinely going from one relationship to another - one at a time - then I would see someone that was handling his singleness respectfully. Someone who seeks a balanced life with enough character to devote himself or herself to one relationship at a time - would be someone who would have sober judgment, and would be careful and considerate of his or her position and the responsibilities they hold.
Peace.
2007-06-01 15:49:14 · answer #11 · answered by Depoetic 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋