English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or the insane half?

2007-06-01 07:56:29 · 49 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

49 answers

Typical liberal...let's not respect the wishes of the electorate unless it favors us.

2007-06-01 07:59:22 · answer #1 · answered by tobcol 5 · 4 3

the following chart telling the average I Q of voters
certainly shows it is the uneducated

147 Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
132 Harry Truman (D)
122 Dwight D. Eisenhower (R)
174 John F. Kennedy (D)
126 Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
155 Richard M. Nixon (R)
121 Gerald R. Ford (R)
176 James E. Carter (D)
105 Ronald W. Reagan (R)
98 George H. W. Bush (R)
182 William J. Clinton (D)
91 George W. Bush (R)
IQ and Voter Preference
State Average IQ 2004
1 Connecticut 113 Kerry
2 Massachusetts 111 Kerry
3 New Jersey 111 Kerry
4 New York 109 Kerry
5 Rhode Island 107 Kerry
6 Hawaii 106 Kerry
7 Maryland 105 Kerry
8 New Hampshire 105 Kerry
9 Illinois 104 Kerry
10 Delaware 103 Kerry
11 Minnesota 102 Kerry
12 Vermont 102 Kerry
13 Washington 102 Kerry
14 California 101 Kerry
15 Pennsylvania 101 Kerry
16 Maine 100 Kerry
17 Virginia 100 Bush
18 Wisconsin 100 Kerry
19 Colorado 99 Bush
20 Iowa 99 Bush
21 Michigan 99 Kerry
22 Nevada 99 Bush
23 Ohio 99 Bush
24 Oregon 99 Kerry
25 Alaska 98 Bush
26 Florida 98 Bush
27 Missouri 98 Bush
28 Kansas 96 Bush
29 Nebraska 95 Bush
30 Arizona 94 Bush
31 Indiana 94 Bush
32 Tennessee 94 Bush
33 North Carolina 93 Bush
34 West Virginia 93 Bush
35 Arkansas 92 Bush
36 Georgia 92 Bush
37 Kentucky 92 Bush
38 New Mexico 92 Bush
39 North Dakota 92 Bush
40 Texas 92 Bush
41 Alabama 90 Bush
42 Louisiana 90 Bush
43 Montana 90 Bush
44 Oklahoma 90 Bush
45 South Dakota 90 Bush
46 South Carolina 89 Bush
47 Wyoming 89 Bush
48 Idaho 87 Bush
49 Utah 87 Bush
50 Mississippi 85 Bush

2007-06-01 08:01:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Bush chose to wage a war based upon a pack of dispicable lies.Bush abrogated the US's obligation on the Geneva Conventions on prisoners of war.In choosing war ,Bush essentially vacated Afghanistan where it all began and where Bin Laden et al are/were and waged war against Iraq where absolutely no Bin Laden type terrorist existed if only because Saddam would never tolerate any challenge to his authority.

Thanks to Bush, the degree/level/strength of terrorism has mutiplied ten fold and the US and other countries are (as has been proven) in much greater danger of terrorism then before
9/11.

Bush has created a war in which over 400,000 INNOCENT IRAQI MEN,WOMEN and CHILDREN have been slaughtered
all because Bush (as he told us) was advised by his God that he was "doing good"

Bush and the neo-cons started this war for OIL( exactly the same reason the US has screwed with the peoples of the Middle East since WW1 including the US's filthy overthrowing of the DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED Iranian government in 1953 and the US's installing of their butchering right wing dictator ,the Shah of Iran all because the stupid Iranians had this stupid idea that it's natural resourses was THEIR'S to decide what to to with. I wonder what Americans will feel when years from now China is the world power and it decides to destroy the US Democracy because it wants US natural resourses.Yes I know,it never is the same thing is it??) and Israel (the neo-conservative movement was founded by a zealotist Zionist and many of it's high profile leaders such as Pearle and Wolfawist (sic) are zionists with extremely close ties with the Likud Party of Israel.

Now to answer the question.

As all of these evil abominations were known when Bush was re-elected,the majority of Americans are de facto immoral/un-ethical hypocrites and deserve to be considered a part of the AXIS OF EVIL along .


When the US government of a nation that constantly shoots it's mouth off about being as CHRISTIAN NATION and then creates conditions for the slaughter of over 400,000 innocent and then in such a UN-CHRIST LIKE WAY REFERS TO THESE 400,000 innocent children of God as COLATERAL
DAMAGE all the while praising/honouring,lauding there relatively few dead,one just knows that like the Roman Empire,the once great US has sadly become an increasingly morally bankrupted place

2007-06-01 08:26:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Well, strictly speaking, the stupid half of America elected him the second time while the other half of America sat at home on their butts and didn't vote.

The first time, he was appointed by the Supreme Court through some really fancy-dancing and voting fraud beyond imagination by Bush and his cronies - with a LOT of help from his brother, who was the governor of the state of Florida - where most of the fraud was committed. He actually LOST the popular vote....

2007-06-01 08:53:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

He was elected by the insane half. There are more crazy people in this country than i thought. Even if someone is stupid, they should have at least enough sanity to know that electing bush is asking for trouble.

2007-06-01 08:01:47 · answer #5 · answered by actress4life 2 · 1 3

Sadly, half of America didn't elect that moron. A mathematical mistake, aka the electoral college, did. Have you ever seen where they compared Europe's leaders, Latin America's leaders, the pope, and our president? Out of all of them, ours was the only one who only spoke one language, and didn't at least have some background in something other than idiocy/politics. The pope speaks like eight languages. Our moron barely speaks English! So, insane half or stupid half? I think they got together, and said "let's ruin the world for mankind" and ..... tada!

2007-06-01 08:01:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

It is always a mistake to presume that those who view things differently from you must be either stupid, or insane. As a member of the half you clearly disdain, I feel I can argue my positions on the merits without resorting to name calling. I don't run into as many from the other half who have the ability or temprament to do likewise.

2007-06-01 08:01:10 · answer #7 · answered by BoilerJax 2 · 2 1

OMG, he has been president for 7 1/2 years and you are still stewing about it? Get over yourself, already. Use some of that obsessive energy to do something constructive-teach people how to read or teach an English class, help feed the homeless or be school crossing guard. It's over, move on.

2007-06-01 08:04:01 · answer #8 · answered by Princess of the Realm 6 · 1 1

Since there was only about a 50% voter turnout, it would also be valid to say that the election was decided by the other 50% who didn't vote at all. To me they are the stupid half.

2007-06-01 08:01:33 · answer #9 · answered by Lorenzo Steed 7 · 2 1

Hahaha, dazzling! i admire your humorousness. many circumstances dazzling in this board i've got seen cons say Obama is like Bush. i've got additionally seen many human beings say Repubs and Dems are a similar (no longer something must be further from the reality, yet we ought to get massive money out of politics to work out extra difference). ##

2016-11-24 22:17:48 · answer #10 · answered by bekis 4 · 0 0

Hindsight is 20-20.
He slithered-in , some think, with the support of a variety of well-wishers including the two types you cite plus the Hopeful and the Uninformed...especially the former, considering the field.
Your fractions are a bit skewed, however.

2007-06-01 08:07:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers