You have to realize which competent government you are talking about, has the Bush Administration been able to fulfill anything which remotely reassembles competence.
2007-06-01 07:37:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
They made alot of very obvious errors, and to answer your question, a missle doesn't leave much debris which is ideal in this situation because it seems that they couldn't salvage much of anything from any of the planes as proof. Lets assume a plane did actually hit the pentagon, then why a big hurry within the hour of the attack to seize surveillance tapes from area businesses that to this day have not been released. The pentagon tapes, or frames I should say didn't show much of anything. They were to close of a view, frames were to far apart. So why not show all the conspiracy theorists a clear video from the hotel or the gas station that caught a wide angle view of a plane heading towards the pentagon? Why not spend the first hour after an attack worrying more about the health and safety of those who were in the building than about what the Ramada Inn's video looked like. I mean, they obviously knew it was a plane, nothing to hide there right?
2007-06-01 14:43:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
911 was more of an inside job than we have been told. The truth will probably never come out. The consequences have been extraordinary. As to your specific question: As stated many times before - where are the video tapes that show the plane hitting the pentagon - I mean the pentagon is under 24 hr watch all the time - several cameras in the area. And , why was the picture of the pentagon ( just after impact) that of a round hole. Planes are not round.
2007-06-09 12:56:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by WVU girl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought that the idea of the pentagon attack was staged was crap but I was challenged to find a picture of the pentagon with part of the aircraft showing. I couldn't, in fact I found pictures taken within the first hour with no plane debris and the hole in the building was actually too small to have been made by the two story high plane. I don't think it was hit by a missile but there certainly are inconsistencies. Also, the first report said a truck bomb was the method of assault.
The bottom line is that the pentagon attack may not be as obvious as the towers were.
2007-06-01 14:38:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Beyond Treason: Pentagon Hit by DU Warhead Missile
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=73&contentid=2600&page=1
A radiation expert and high-ranking Army Major, who once headed the military’s depleted uranium project, both contend the Pentagon was hit by missile, not a commercial jetliner, adding high radiation readings after the strike indicate depleted uranium also may have been used.
“I’m not an explosives or crash site expert, but I am highly knowledgeable in causes and effects related to nuclear radiation contamination. What happened at the Pentagon is highly suspicious, leading me to believe a missile with a depleted uranium warhead may have been used,” said radiation expert Leuren Moret in a telephone conversation this week from her Berkeley, CA home.
Moret, who has spent a life time working in the nuclear field, first as a staff scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory in California, is now a member of The Radiation and Public Health Project (RPHP), a privately funded group studying the devastating effects of depleted uranium especially in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Regarding the missile theory, it is also backed up by retired Army Maj. Doug Rokke, a PhD educational physics and former top military expert banished from the Pentagon after the military failed to follow regulations regarding the use, clean up and medical treatment regarding the use of depleted uranium.
Rumsfeld admits missile hit the Pentagon
http://www.democrats.com/node/5056
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics and History/Missile-Not-Flight-77.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3845
http://news.netscape.com/story/2007/05/15/rosie-brings-up-9-11-conspiracy/comment/882779
911 Uncovered – The Pentagon Missile Strike
http://www.911uncovered.com/pentagon.html
911: "9/11 Truth Movement", Pentagon Strike"-Video and Griffin hit Washington Post
http://www.blacklinux.com/hosted/pentagonstrike/
http://www.amics21.com/911/pentagon.html
2007-06-07 00:51:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What I am telling you is that a 757 could not have hit the pentagon...IMPOSSIBLE!!
the hole was too small..
they claimed that a person who could barely fly a single engine cesna... by himself.. single handedly highjacked a plane that size and did all kinds of wicked maneuvers which pilots with thirty years experience have said that they could not do.. and flew the damn plane over protected airspace and knocked over several light posts while flying two damn feet off the ground to continue it's tidy path onto the side of the pentagon.... which by the way, was the coincidental side which was under renovation and therefore did not have all offices occupied... people.... are you starting to get the message here??
the conspiracy is being perpetrated by your own government.. time to open the proverbial eye..
WAKE UP!!
2007-06-01 15:04:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
The white cloud of smoke is indicative of a missile, jets use turbofans which only release white vapour at very high altitudes, they do not release white smoke at ground level, just watch any jet taxiing around at the airport. The proof is in plain sight people. The Feds confiscated 80 security film tapes from in and around the pentagon that day....they only released 4 frames that show a white vapour trail and explosion!!! the vapour trail is what proves it was a missile.
2007-06-01 16:40:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
You DO realize that since you believe in the official explanation of events on 911, that YOU ALSO are a conspiracy theorist, don't you?
You just happen to believe your conspiracy theory is the correct theory, and others aren't.
Why is your view also a conspiracy theory? Because nobody had a view of the interior steel frames of the WTC towers as they were collapsing to confirm that they collapsed as the official version claims.
The official explanation only contains a theory for what happened inside the towers that day as well.
So don't be thinking that you're anything different than the people you deride. You're a conspiracy theorist also.
2007-06-01 14:59:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
George Bush and Cheney DID IT!! they had the Military take out the Towers and the Pentagon, I am a Full believer of the 9/11 conspiracy theory and I know they did it. They wanted OIL and to stuff their pockets with A lot of money. They may have even called upon Aliens from other planets to do this, It's a possibility.
2007-06-01 14:50:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
You make a very good point. It is kind of strange though that there is no video footage of the plane crashing into the pentagon.
2007-06-08 13:06:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
that would be a waste of money besides the missle was mistaken for a plane thought witht he camera tapes that the government confiscated. They planned it to start the war in iraq for oil
2007-06-01 14:47:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋