Now that Bush has proposed talks to cut greenhouse emissions will conservatives still deny global warming?

Question

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/31/AR2007053100934.html?hpid=topnews

Answer 1

Just like Bush, most will pretend that they’ve been in favor of reducing greenhouse emissions all along. Conservatives usually take a while to get up to speed on issues and then they have the gall to act as if they’ve always supported the liberal position—e.g. civil rights for African Americans. It’s really laughable but better late than never.

Answer 2

Never "denied" it to begin with but some idiots think the man has brought it on and that is 100% BS. This "Global Warming" used to be called the "Tropical Age" and was taught when I was in the 8th grade. It's a natural occurrence and even though man might have brought it on a little faster, it would have happened anyway. Every year the earth moves 1 inch closer to the sun and in hundreds (if not thousands) of years it would become unbearable.

BTW, that Washington post thing is know for it's Arab financiers so don't hold them to show you the truth.

Answer 3

yes we will. just because he's proposed greenhouse emission cuts.. does not mean he believes the "global warming" theory. you cannot prove something like that based on a couple of decades. that's why i do not believe in this farse. no one that i know, who does not believe in the "global warming" conspiracy, believes that humans should not do their part in trying to improve our environment. we just believe that humans are NOT to blame entirely for climate changes and storms and ice melting.. whatever... there have been 15 ice ages in recorded geological history.. the most recent , 200 years ago... we cannot prevent mother nature from doing what she wants to us. we are at her mercy. people need to stop trying to think that we are above the will of mother earth. our planet will change as it has done for a verrrrrrry long time. we cannot stop that. but, i do agree that pouring dangerous gases into our atmosphere is not the brightest idea and anything we can do.. reasonably... to help, should be looked at. i wish this was all about our home and how to improve it.. but, unfortunatey, it's a political platform.. and a way for nutjob leftist environmentalists to stick it to corporations. if you remember, back in the 80s, our planet was on the verge of a huge ice age... now, everything's gonna melt and cause tidal waves.. blah, blah, blah... make up ya minds people!

Answer 4

That's a great question. Bush started giving credibility to global warming theories in his last state of the Union Address. It must be in his best interest to flip flop from his position in the 2000 campaign, just like he flip flopped on his pledge not to attempt nation building. There are some people who still have interests in the oil companies or are still duped by the oil companies. Those people will hang onto their denials until they die (probably from drowning or cancer caused by global warming).

Answer 5

carbon dioxide and monoxide are the significant motives of the international warming CO2 is produced by utilising autos factories burning stuff etc. yet CO2 isn't continually an issue as an occasion if the international has a numerous flora CO2 would not be an issue yet because of the fact of people numerous flora are long gone Carbon monoxide is produced additionally in autos and in case you lighted a candle and putted a jar on it this is going to produce CO witch is poisonous

Answer 6

He is using the Office of The President to promote his Ethanol Cartel.

Bush could care less about Global Warming.

Answer 7

THOMAS (A RESURECTION SKEPTIC) ABOUT JESUS (so-called):

- lesions are not proof its you
- lesions happened before
- its not the lesions that come from crucifiction, its the people who have lesions who get crucified
- lesions come and go.. its part of a cycle
- Jesus had more lesions before in a period known as "the lesion age" while working as a carpenter with his dad
- it is only a coincidence the lesions are at the same place as the man who got crucified
- Jesus did not die on the cross, it is well documented
- there is no consensus on the crucifiction
- this whole resurection thing is a hoax from roman politicians who try to get the jews to riot
- the Jesus resurection is a way to get your money for a new religion
- other people also have lesions
- we do not understand crucifictions and resurection
- this guy is just recovering from a box fight

Answer 8

A lie is a lie, whither championed by Republican, Democrat, Communist what ever. We who do not believe that American automobiles are the cause of what ever is happening base this on many things, including the fact that if you really research the matter, you will find out that the other 8 planets in our solar system are also increasing in temp, by almost the same degree. I guess the American workers are responsible for those worlds as well.

If Mr. Bush wishes to destroy our economy for this lie, so be it. I live in the country, we grown our own food, we do not NEED trucks to bring our food to us, do you?, you get hungry enough, you will wise up especially when your children start to go with out food. Can you grow what you need to live on where you live, can you walk everywhere you need to go, are you ready to live in the dark? Think about it, before you jump in with both feet.

Answer 9

Dude this one is a no brainer. The ones who deny greenhouse emissions are the ones who will suffer if cleaner greenhouse regulation are passed. ie big corporations etc

Answer 10

I think we have pollution and that needs to be addressed as the president is. As for global warming I've lived thru these kinds of scares and a lot of money was spent on them that was never used for the 'problem'. Just like now. Wouldn't it be more convincing if Gore sold his sprawing mansion, bought a smaller house and contribute the money to his cause? Or gave up private jet travel and donate some of that money?