2007-06-01 05:47:24 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ UEFA Champions League
man utd of course... no question...
2007-06-02 02:04:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is no contest here. Manchester United have a rich and prestigious history and are renowned globally as one of the best attacking British teams to watch probably behind Arsenal in their prime. They have built a squad of young world class talent that are cutting it in the top competitions and have a charismatic style and spirit glowing around the team and staff.
4 Years ago, your question would not have existed Mr. Something Wrong. Chelsea are a manufactured piece of garbage. Their style of football is generic and average for team that is built with some of the best footballing talent on the planet, and even with this team struggle to beat opponents like Watford! Their team in fact is so manufactured that in 3 years half of the first team would have changed because many of their top class players are already approaching 30 if not older. Makalele, Drogba, Ballack, Shevchenko to name a few.
Were is the history Pre- Abramovich? Um..nowhere. Probably and League Cup or two whearas Man Utd are backed by 12 FA Cups and 9 Premiership titles including 1 League Cup and did I forget a Champions Leauge Cup. Chelsea's trophy cabinet stands nowhere amonst the big boys of europe. Real Madrid, Valencia, Liverpool, AC Milan, Inter, Juventus, to name a handful again. And to clarify my point here are a few facts.
- Monaco have gotten to a champions league final chelski- no
-Arsenal have won the league more time than chelski
- Chelsea have the most expensive squad on the planet yet
couldn't retain the league title or get far in european
competition with an experienced team.
Need i say anymore?
2007-06-02 19:57:47 · answer #2 · answered by Rich360 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although I prefer Chelsea, I must admit that this past season Manchester had better squad. Chelsea had extravagant budget, but made poor decisions at transfer window. Sheva didn't perform as he was expected before, let alone Boulahrouz. They relied too much on Drogba.
It doesn't mean Man U were flawless, they were just 'better'.
2007-06-02 13:50:59 · answer #3 · answered by r083r70v1ch 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Manchester united has all the right players with all the right skills. For example, Giggs is the best crosser in the league, Cristi is the best ballhandler, Ronney's got the scoring thing down, and saha is the best sub in the EPL. Plus hargreaves is coming to good old manchester so they are invincible now.
2007-06-03 11:17:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chelsea.
2007-06-02 03:00:19 · answer #5 · answered by foongwk140804 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Im pretty sure Chelsea are as they won 2 of the 4 competitions this year while Man U only won 1.
2007-06-02 08:12:50 · answer #6 · answered by kaka k 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Manchester!!
2007-06-01 17:08:29 · answer #7 · answered by Pinky 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Just for fun...walk between Old Trafford and the City of Manchester stadium asking whether 'Manchester' are a good football team...
2007-06-01 19:35:22 · answer #8 · answered by madgooner 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Chelsea of course
2007-06-02 10:18:57 · answer #9 · answered by faro the architect 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
manchester united by all means they r the best
2007-06-02 23:07:49 · answer #10 · answered by eshaan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man Utd are better as they don't rely on any one player to do the majority of the goal scoring... and their squad just got so much better with nani and anderson not to mention hargreaves... he'll be the closest replacement to keane they've had since he left.
2007-06-03 00:41:16 · answer #11 · answered by dilutedcoffee 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋