this
2007-06-01 05:41:40 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
sorry chaps england....read this item on an internet site
2007-06-01 05:46:39 · update #1
sarah..how did you guess
2007-06-01 05:48:04 · update #2
A GREAT idea
Provided they lead this by removing ALL the CCTV camera's that have us under the lens day in day out as we go about our Legal business
I do not subscribe to this "for your own protection" or the "if you ain't doing anything wrong" brigade it is nothing less than invasion of privacy and is against our human rights to be under surveillance in our every day lived
It seems we are guilty before the crime, what next ??? Identity cards to prove we are who we say we are ??? chips in our vehicles so that we can be found when needed ( or set up by the information collected ???
Why not just have us chipped at birth so that our whereabouts are known at any moment
so YES PLEASE to the Banning of photo's but only AFTER the Government stops spying on us
2007-06-01 05:52:28 · answer #1 · answered by Roger 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
picture taken during WW II shows all around st Paul's burning and then the magnificent dome showing above the rubble. The British people worked hard to save ST Paul's and Prince Charles and Princess Diana got married there in 1981.
2016-05-18 21:05:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Talking about the USA.
There have been signs all over NY & NJ bridges & tunnels since 9/11. like "Photography & Video prohibited".
I can live with it..
A business acquaintance told me his father reported an incident to the FBI .
His commute takes him over the Goethals & Verrazano bridges & shorthly after 9/11, while in traffic saw a man/men in a car videotaping both bridges,
He gave the license # to the FBI who thanked him for his effort
& indicated they might want to interview him at a later time.
Do not know of the outcome.
Sign of the times.
2007-06-01 06:06:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What a load of poo poo the blighters will forbid you to breath next. I think this government is so incompetent that it has to appear to do something. to protect children this time I suppose. I am male and I am fed up with so called children's protectors suspecting me of trying to groom a child for no other reason that I am male. It has almost got to the point where I have to be accompanied by a child before i am allowed to talk to another. i will not do it other than when their parents are about because of fear of a false accusation.
It is noticed that fewer a fewer males are prepared to even volunteer to help with children's charities not because of child protection enquiries but because they fear a false accusation which even if shown to be groundless will ruin their reputation for good and may even cost the their livelihood the
2007-06-01 08:36:27 · answer #4 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
This has got to be a joke !!!!They will be watching us in our own homes next
.Over the last couple of years the Government are slowly turning us into a nanny state
We will be to frightened to do anything soon
2007-06-01 08:13:06 · answer #5 · answered by Black Orchid 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obviously you must be the pervert who has been taking cell phone pictures of women and girls underwear if they're wearing dresses and skirts while walking up and down the stairs.
2007-06-01 05:46:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is called communisum. I know, I visited Eastern Europe when it was communist. It was horrible,we had to make sure of our suroundings before we could take any family pictures. Big Brother is watching!
2007-06-01 05:57:52 · answer #7 · answered by Marilyn T 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's just a ploy to prevent us from catching the government ripping us off!
2007-06-01 05:47:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Total Crap.
Where is the URL address?
Nothing in papers/TV and my local MP returned my email saying it was the best joke he`s read for ages...
2007-06-01 05:52:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
they take over 300 images everyday of every body are they just after a monopoly on it
2007-06-01 05:49:03 · answer #10 · answered by bigtdotcom 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋