English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would the anti abortion lot support this solution? or not?

Forcibly if nec but to all girls all over the world... reversibly sterilise (guys too) them so its physically impossible to get pregnant before puberty.


But allow all other processes to contine so they get oll the sexire, need for ssex and love enjoyment of it and personality... just no babies.


And take away 1/4 of the funds of the church and islam to irradicate all STDS from the planet...

With permission granted to all who want a baby only when over 24.

After having filled in forms daily for say 6 months in a stable relationship or older with exceptions if single.

Then its reversed. In other words wait till after then have lived somewhat, gained some life experience, hopefully finished education and bloody well sure.

So absolutely no danger of unwanted pregnancy or stds.

Oh and an active practicing single ex porn star/pole dancer lesbian made pope/head of islam.

a church ban on all homophobia

2007-06-01 04:40:01 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

Islamic too. An end to all honour killings, stonings and any punishments for sex outside any marriage.


Therefore people are free to have any sex they like as long a it does not hurt others (ie peadophilia or rape).


And no consequences for unwanted pregnany or stds.

Oh and as soon as the couple does not want to conceive re reversible sterilisation.

Then only abortions for medical, rape etc.


How many anti abortionists would support that?



Or is the whole anti abortion thing nothing to do with thw wealfare of so called unborn kids and everything to do with its anti unmarried non procreations sexaul activity and freedom for females to have a life?


And all about control as after all once you have a baby you are not free anymore are you?

2007-06-01 04:41:16 · update #1

*****************


THIS IS ACTUALLY CONNON SENSE


* Its saying no babies get born untill the mothers have had a fair chance to get educated, form a career, have a life, travel etc.

THATS COMMON SENSE

* Its saying no babies are born or girls get pregnant unless damn sure they want to be. Hence making it so much grief


THATS COMMON SENSE


its also saying anti abortionists put you money where your mouth is. and show that if this anti abortion stance was really about protection of foestuses etc...


show you would be prepared to give up on ALL purtian, anti sexaulity morlality codes and sexaul repression.


And end STDs and unwanted pregnancies so no resticions of sex for affection, love or pleasure.

But placing the church and islams most anti puritan figures in charge

THATS COMMON SENSE

2007-06-01 04:58:06 · update #2

Ending all stds and having perfect contraception

THATS COMMON SENSE

2007-06-01 04:58:30 · update #3

why 24... most going though uni would go between 18 and 21 then that leaves a year to travel and a year to start to get a job and time to have been clubbing, parties, gigs, festivals and a bit of a life at least.


Hence it better later in life so you wont miss out of stuff and better able to look after a kid

2007-06-03 04:07:53 · update #4

16 answers

SOMEONE woke up on the wrong side of their agenda this morning!

2007-06-01 04:43:13 · answer #1 · answered by Dalice Nelson 6 · 6 0

WHAT okay i dont know why 24 but im only 19 and i got pregnant at 17 and had him 3 months before i turned 18 i am a really good mother never had any problems i live with my partner just the 3 of us and another one on the way i was young and only cause older people can be much mature sometimes dosent mean younger ones cant any one any age can be perfectly good at being a mother ...you really dont understand
do you

2007-06-07 14:11:25 · answer #2 · answered by AMIEE B 2 · 0 0

Do know how many human rights you have just destroyed in your idea. I t is disgusting how many teenage and unwanted pregnancy's are resulting in abortion nowadays but i hardly think making a couple fill out forms daily in order to be allowed to conceive is a great solution.

Maybe a bit more education on the matter would suffice and making people understand the importance of safe sex, using a condom, etc.....

2007-06-01 12:26:38 · answer #3 · answered by Jodie M 1 · 3 0

I am not an anti abortionist, but

I think that every single person who wanted a baby should be vetted before being allowed to conceive. OK, it would cost money, so make people pay for a license, £50 or whatever. They would then have to go through a certian procedure, criminal record checks, mental health and medical history checks and home visits to check their ability to bring up a child.

Imagine the things this would stop. No criminals or paedophiles could have a baby, nobody who was going to be abusive to their children like drunks, duggies or people with mental health problems culd have a baby until their problems were sorted etc.

Doing things this way, and stoppng people from having children who were unfit would reduce the amount of child abuse and the number of irresponsible people who just have kids to get back at their other half, or to get benefits or whatever.

I hate anti-abortionists. Always have, always will.

2007-06-01 14:54:14 · answer #4 · answered by Rachel H 2 · 0 4

No. Not just because you're insane (ever hear or separation of church and state?) , but because it won't work. You know, not all women who get abortions are low-income teens! What about women who are married? Who have already had children?
Plus your plan sounds one step away from eugenics to me. We have age restrictions and require a certain level of education and income, what's next? An IQ test? A test of racial purity? I'll pass!
But thanks for reminding me why I'm a pro-life moderate.

2007-06-01 12:01:10 · answer #5 · answered by Kelsey H 6 · 4 0

I do not understand the torture a decent woman goes through to make this horrible decision, but I think you want a lie down and a cup of tea, you might feel better

2007-06-06 18:03:55 · answer #6 · answered by Scouse 7 · 2 0

Wow, what?

I dont even want to respond to that. Most of it didnt make sense to me.

But in response to your first line, "Forcibly if nec but to all girls all over the world... reversibly sterilise (guys too) them so its physically impossible to get pregnant before puberty"

you cant get pregnant until you hit puberty anyway...smart guy.

try posting under polls and surveys


Adios!

2007-06-01 12:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by MommyTwice-TwiceTheLove 4 · 4 0

I don't think you understand the subject fully.
You clearly are very immature.

Permission after 24! crazy stuff it would never happen as have you heard of such thing as free will??
I'm pregnant and almost 24 and don't see myself as too young.

You need to read about the sanctity of life then post an informed question

2007-06-01 11:46:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

You seem to just not understand. People can be perfectly good parents at any age, by the way why 24?

2007-06-01 15:27:45 · answer #9 · answered by Sarah X 3 · 2 0

i think you have tried to blow this whole thing out of proportion.

i see what you are trying to say, but i dont agree with it.

i do believe something needs to be done, to seriously cut down abortion rates, but i do feel that there is very genuine reasons for a small percentage of them.

x

2007-06-07 10:51:43 · answer #10 · answered by lovelifelivelife 2 · 0 0

Stranely enough I can see your point - (I'll get thumbs down for that!!)

However... Saying no to everyone under 24 would be just wrong, I had my son at 17 and he is loved and wanted, and I have just had a little grl, and I'm now 23...

:-)

2007-06-01 11:54:01 · answer #11 · answered by Krissyinthesun 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers