Sure women can murder just as easily as men but I am talking specifically about a woman's right to murder her own children (abortion). Some people I guess would argue that you can do what ever you want to your own children but MURDER! Isn't abortion a little extreme?
2007-05-31 20:03:49 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Isn't murder worse than abuse though? Abortion is no different than killing the child right after birth. You just don't have to view the murder itself if you commit it where it can't be seen inside the body.
2007-05-31 20:14:40 · update #1
"If it's not your body or your fetus, it's not your business. Got it?"
So does that mean that if I don't have a child at Virginia Tech then I should not care about those murders as well? Nice logic hitler.
2007-05-31 20:17:59 · update #2
Lefties is the one that think abortion is okay. Not the right side. Abortion is murder of a unborn human being. Lots of people would love to have that child to raise as their own, and give it a wonderful life. Why Abort , when you can adopt, save a life.
2007-05-31 20:21:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I thank God Almighty women in this country enjoy reproductive autonomy. Nothing could be more hideous than some misbegotten dogooder forcing some recalcitrant mother to give birth against her will.
Look, I want to scream at these vile interfering busybodies--if a girl would rather have an abortion than give birth, what makes you think she would make that great a mother at this point in her life? If a woman is not willing to give up tobacco and alcohol, why should she give birth?
Then there are the other things. Suppose a woman discovers she carries an anacephalic child? (A baby without a brain). These cannot survive much beyond parturition. But our legislators have determined that such women should suffer the pain and humiliation of either carrying such to term, or suffering the much more expensive and dangerous c-section abortions. They can no longer avail themselves of cheap and effective dilation and cuterage, which has a much smaller cost and shorter recovery time.
That is what you get when you let lawyers practice medicine. They make a mockery of both.
Abortion should be a decision left to a woman and her doctor. If YOU don't want an abortion--very simple. Don't get one. Don't force some young woman, a victim of incestuous rape, broken condom, or whatever, to suffer YOUR moral failings. Let her make her own decisions. God granted us free will, not so we would abuse it by passing laws forcing everyone to live by our own private moral standards, but so that each might learn from his own mistakes.
2007-06-01 03:45:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
According to the law, it isn't murder. That is your definition of it.
I don't like violence against any living thing, but I do not feel that I have the right to tell any woman what she can or cannot do with her body. That fetus is relying on her organs for its development, so the decision should be hers entirely IMHO and I very much doubt it is an easy decision for her to make.
If a woman completes her pregnancy, I believe it is the duty of society to give support to her and her child.
If a woman has an abortion, I believe it is the duty of society to support her.
2007-06-01 03:10:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
In Exodus, god states that if a man beats a pregnant woman causing her unborn baby to die, he shall pay a fine, but if the woman dies, a life for a life.
Sounds like god doesn't place much value on a fetus. I would agree with god on this one.
2007-06-01 03:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If it's not your body or your fetus, it's not your business. Got it?
I said fetus, not child, dimbulb. How dare you bring VT into this discussion. What a cheap shot! You fascists will stop at nothing, will you?
2007-06-01 03:14:46 · answer #5 · answered by Alice K 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋