Can u count the lies to America about the Federal government's conspiracy of 9/11?

Question

Legally a 'conspiracy' is a crime committed by 2 or persons. So yes, the Federal Government has a conspiracy theory by legal definiton.

a) The FBI told us 19 hijackers committed mass murder on 9/11. Yet 6 or 7 the alledged hijackers came forward and stated their passports were either lost or stolen. So the FBI had to announce that they really don't legally know how many hi-jackers there were. So we can all stop saying 19. The figure has been proven wrong by the FBI.

b) Bush told us Osma bin Ladden's family was not allowed to leave directly after 9/11. He told us not to believe the 'conspiracy' theorist. Yet 2 yrs later - the Fed's say, "Yeah, we let the family leave." W/o being questioned by the F.B.I.
Lie # 2.

c) We were told that there we no cameras that 'shot' the Pent crash. Under pressure, they release '5 barely visable frames'. However they refuse to release the 3 tapes from the cameras atop the Sheraton, Dept of Trans, & the gas station.

Why not show us the tapes from the cameras that would have had a clear shot at the Pentagon? It makes no sense.

d) In the crash at the Pentagon, there's a picture of a turbine fan. Now why doesn't the Fed's simply show us the fan fits the turbine fan from the same type of engine that hit the pentagon. Just show us and say, "See everyone, it's the exact same." Simply show us. What's the problem.

e) The coroner who was phyiscally at the crash in the field said he didn't see any pieces of a plane. Didn't see any body parts, didn't see any blood, didn't see any luggage. And the crash left a hole about 20 ft by 12 ft deep? R u kidding me? No plane in avaition history has ever crash into a field, trees, mountain, w/o leaving wreckage. NEVER! Now, if u think the govt 'may' have lied about going into Iraq - cuz we know they lied us into Viet Nam (the attack in the gulf of tonken - NEVER happened) and Johnson later admitted he made it up.

U can character assasinate me all the day long however u can't give me logical reasons. U can't - Why?

Why not release the 3 tapes from the 3 cameras that had a direct shot at the pentagon hit?

Hey Mike - what's the 'half-truths' u speak of?

Answer 1

The minority that knows better and agrees with you are not surprised at all with your statement. The vast majority however that disagree with you fall into several categories. First theres the brainwashed by television crowd that still believes whatever the news tells them. Theres the "ain't no way Bush could have planned something that complex". Then comes the " we were taught to be accepting of everything and to avoid conflict" crowd. The just plain ignorant ones that still can't figure out much of anything. And lastly the still in denial crowd that even when looking at pure fact they have to default to a childish remark as if that makes their point the final say. What most fail to address is why the government is not answering questions and providing proof. If the attack was foreign why would you withold footage of a plane hitting the pentagon, unless one never hit it. The actions taken are not consistent with innocence. Never in the history of air disasters has a jumbo jet vaporized beyond a trace. The heat required would not have left a book intact on a chair where the wing should have hit. Why did they confiscate the tapes and not show them when doing so would end the conspiracy theory on at least the Pentagon.

Answer 2

The Bush Administration's lies SINCE 9/11 don't mean they were part of any conspiracy to carry out the attacks ON 9/11.

Al Qaeda's plan on 9/11 was to crash planes into each tower, the Pentagon and the Capitol Building. If the Bush Administration and not Al Qaeda was behind the attack it would have been planned by Karl Rove and Dick Cheney, two VERY intelligent men. Do you really think they would have created a plan to fly four planes into buildings which would require DOZENS of co-conspirators to carry-out something that had no great guarantee of success AND if caught would mean a firing squad for all of them????

Reknowned leftist, brilliant philosopher and political activist Noam Chomsky says that such a conspiracy is EXTREMELY unlikely and the scientific "evidence" supporting it is easily refuted by scholars the world over.

The reason people believe in this conspiracy is because psychologically speaking they need to because they can't deal with it otherwise.

Please, see a therapist and God bless you.

Answer 3

There's overwhelming evidence that the Pentagon has hit by a commercial plane. First of all, if the plane didn't hit the Pentagon, where is that plane now?

High speed plane crashes into solid objects (such as the ground or the Pentagon) are well-known to pulverize the plane. However, there were still pieces recovered including the landing gear, body parts.

Blast expert Allyn E. Kilsheimer was the first structural engineer to arrive. "It was absolutely a plane, and I'll tell you why," says Kilsheimer, "I saw the marks of the plane wing on the face of the building. I picked up parts of the plane with the airline markings on them. I held in my hand the tail section of the plane, and I found the black box." Kilsheimer's eyewitness account is backed up by photos of plane wreckage inside and outside the building. Kilsheimer adds: "I held parts of uniforms from crew members in my hands, including body parts. Okay?" (Pop Mechanics)

Also, hundreds of morning commuters saw the low-flying plane coming in & dozens of them told reporters & these accounts were printed in the newspapers. At least 2 people used cell phones saying they were hijacked. (Pop Mech p63)

Nearby video recorders did not pick up anything except a blurry image since they were going at only a slow frame rate & the plane was moving at 780 feet/second.

Answer 4

that's humorous how one of those vast quantity of of those conspiracy junkies communicate about how inept the Bush administration is, yet W become able to pull off something like 911? nicely, that's it? The bumbling Commander in chief or the awesome mastermind in the back of 911? i imagine if, really, our authorities become in contact, they actually would have solidified their invasion of Iraq by utilising FILLING it with WMD's. compared to 911 that would prefer to were quite effortless. They probably would have positioned one lower than Saddam's mattress if so needed. Then W would have by no ability heard that stupid, drained previous rant - "guns of mass deception". the line would actual make sense and be rather a lot smart hadn't WE provided Iraq with various those guns in the course of their warfare with Iran. those conspiracy theorists supply our authorities thanks to a lot credit. they are basically no longer that smart.

Answer 5

Gee - that's three, sort of partial half truths, based on immediate reactions. As for c. What do you think - it was a missile and the FBI killed off the passengers on the plane someplace else?

Answer 6

I wonder how conspiracy theorists felt about JFK. Conspiracy? Yeah you would have a whole bunch of 'em clogged on Y/A if the internet was available back then

Answer 7

Ok

a) Criminals use fake IDs routinely. I don't know what your point is on that. You can't equate someone being 'wrong' to 'lying'. FBI did get confused because of discovery of stolen IDs.

b) Bin Laden have some 55 siblings(may be more). All millionaires and probably don't live like Brady bunch all under one roof. Many of them probably live like movie stars and probably not into whole extremism. Except Usama.

Bush knows all 55 Usama's brothers and sisters?

c) I'm not sure what will be the point of looking at it from 10 different angles when bunch of people saw this big airliner fly over their heads on highway.

Clips from gas station, other places are further away and probably at worse angle. Not to mention lower frame rates which is likely to produce blur on these camera images from great distance away. Likely to have lower quality image of crash which I'm sure would excite conspiracy theorists.

May be those witnesses were mind controlled. Who knows?


Pentagon had reinforce concrete wall. No jets can't penetrate this type of structure. But the plane's nose, pointed end, might punch small hole.

If it was cruise missile like some claim there would be huge bomb crater(which we didn't see) and it will blow up roof off of Pentagon. Those military cruise missile contain some over 1200lbs of high explosives. Its not going to just punch hole like this jet did. Missile will blow away entire side of building.

If 1200lbs of explosives hit Pentagon I'll bet you trillion bucks the hole will be larger than 20ft wide.

But if something with no explosives like a jet plane hits it, it might punch a hole before exploding into pieces.

You make excellent point planes do leave plane parts. This one did too. Windows, landing gears, door panels...etc. Photos exist. But this plane ran into reinforced concrete wall head on. Not into soft ground or water like most crashes.

Also many witnesses were describing how devastating the crash was. Like some might say 'man, that impact was so hard I saw no plane parts.' Meaning yes it is plane crash, but because the impact is go great the person didn't see recognizable plane parts.

Kind of like I might say 'man, I didn't see any human parts after that guy blew himself up.'

You ever heard of something called context? In English?

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1




Why did we go to Iraq? Here's rough time line.

1991-Iraqi invade Kuwait CIA intel gets it wrong
1990s- The US bomb Iraq, no fly zones contested, more bombing missions in Iraq, WTC bombed, Osama attacks US embassy, US navy ship.
INC, Iraqi National Congress keeps feeding US intelligence community with crap full of intel on Saddam's WMDs.
1998- Our official Iraq policy becomes 'regime change.' Clinton signs this thing
2000-Bush jr wins election or he fight it out in supreme court
2001-Bush is sworn in, His administration include notable neocons who want Saddam out.
2001/09/11-WTC, Pentagon attacked, Taliban in Afghan falls quickly,
Note: Bush was in office less than 1 year when 911 hits.
2003-Iraq invasion

If US gov is involved in 9/11 in order to remove Saddam it will have to include Clinton, Bush Sr, and everybody who worked in our gov since 1991. May be even before.

It is complete LIE to say 9/11 alone sent us into Iraq 2003. There's over decade of history that led us into Iraq war 2003.

Answer 8

All this has been debunked time and time again (except the part about Bush being a liar). So what are you trying to prove?
Meow Mix, will you marry me?

Answer 9

~I'm sure there are a ton of lies, a lot of which we aren't even aware of... yet. Bush should be impeached.
How can there still be people who still support him?~

**Eric G, the past is very important, it has everything to do with what's happening TODAY.