Well, the first Amnesty, 21 years ago, was offered to about 3 million, and ultimately granted to around 5 million. That attracted another 12 million who are waiting around for the current one.
Just extrapolating from that, the current one could ultimately be taken by as many as 20 million, and attract another 48 million in 20 years.
2007-05-31 14:51:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Another myth. Just like the one that Bill Gates and his cronies are trying to pull off by saying we need to bring in HB1 Visa workers from India for skilled labor jobs. They want the number increased because they say they can't staff these jobs with American Labor. However, American colleges are graduating more students than needed in these exact same fields. The only thing this does is devalue the salary paid to these bright students....why bother studying when your government is bringing in cheap labor and stealing your jobs.
As for the12 million low skilled illegal immigrants....I am sure we will have no problem getting them because the Mexicans continue to disregard our laws and borders, and our government continues to do nothing about it. For instance, the Reports that came out today saying that National Guard Units are being pulled off the border and sent to Iraq.
I remember all this Amnesty crap when we did it with President Reagan. I supported it than, but it has been a disaster for this country and I can't support it a second time. Wake up America...Secure Your Boders...And Your Future.
2007-05-31 15:06:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Need them or not, we are going to get them, and more! Past has proven that amnesty doesn't work to curb or stop illegal immigration. All it does is instill hope that in another 20 years, they will do it again.
The government looks at it like wiping the slate clean and starting over. Illegal immigrants look at it as the waiting period to become legal for free!
2007-05-31 14:51:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
They make company extra rewarding through fact they paintings for low wages and shop wages decrease for American workers. a lot of human beings of a similar human beings additionally think of that out sourcing and removing the minimum salary could help the economic device. Govenment advantages for low salary worker fee far much less that paying a residing wages so people who worked finished time does not want government classes
2016-12-18 10:22:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most of them will not become better educated because the system will just dumb down our children to accommodate them in the schools. There will still be plenty of them that refuse to learn english or keep their kids in school. That's basically how it was when I was growing up in California.
2007-05-31 14:58:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by SaraB 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yep.....that's why this whole thing is such a joke. The only way they could get by is to be literally RACIST against whites, blacks and Asians who are alredy here. Otherwise they would have to import them from somewhere else. If all we NEED them for is vegetable picking....then school and the Dream act would be null and void.
2007-05-31 14:53:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Apparently some think so, especially Kennedy, he is the one that started this mess over 20 yrs ago. He needs to be voted out and put out to pasture with the rest of the.........!
2007-05-31 14:52:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Are this first batch becoming educated.. how? Are they in our legal schools and they are illegal... What is wrong with this picture?
2007-05-31 14:51:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
they wont become better educated and skilled. once they become americans and companies are forced to pay them min. wage 2/3rds of them will be laid off and have to go on welfare.
2007-05-31 14:50:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, we don't need them. Our country should take care of it's on and quit giving the free lunches.
2007-05-31 14:51:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jan C 7
·
2⤊
0⤋