The United States Senate rejected United States membership in the League of Nations after World War I mainly because its Senate opponents
a - feared that membership would infringe upon United States national sovereignty
b - believed that membership would end United States participation in military alliances
c - did not wish to give financial aid to an international organization
d - were more concerned about the domestic problems created by the Great Depression
2007-05-31 13:50:10 · 3 answers · asked by Beth 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
A, B, and C were all arguments cited.
A was the biggest reason, though. There was a fear an international organization would add another layer of taxation and subjugate the American people for their own purposes.
2007-05-31 14:30:51 · answer #1 · answered by Guy Divine 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
exciting question. i think of an incredible sort of the scientific advances could have come from Europe besides because of the fact most of the US are descended from ecu colonists. perhaps the concepts would not have befell as immediately nevertheless because of the fact Europe replaced into economically crippled after the 1st international conflict. united statesa.'s intervention interior the wars and its advocacy for self determination very much helped velocity up the efforts to preserve peace in Europe. although different than that i do no longer think of the international could be in a plenty worse state than that's on the 2nd. Human rights circulation could have went on regardless and large Britain in particular replaced right into a brilliant hotspot for Asian and African immigration. in actuality the united kingdom is a much greater multicultural society right this moment than the US.
2016-10-09 05:34:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the best answer is a. However there are arguments for the answer being a,b, and c but a. has a little more punch behind it.
2007-05-31 18:08:37 · answer #3 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋