They both have the name Shand. Camillas father was Bruce Shand, and Peter Shand Kidd, Dianas mothers 2nd husband.
2007-05-31 09:31:30 · 14 answers · asked by garyruk 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
Both Camilla and Diana were direct descendants of King Charles II through his illegitimate son Charles Lennox, which would make them distant cousins.
2007-05-31 11:01:29 · answer #1 · answered by JerH1 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Camilla is related to another mistress, the last mistress of King Edward VII, Alice Keppel.Then there's a distant link through King Charles II that ties Camilla and Diana's family together. And there's a possibility that Andrew Parker-Bowles' family has a distant link to the Royal family as well.
2007-06-01 08:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are not related.....and anyway Peter Shand Kidd being Diana's mother's 2nd husband would not even make him related to Diana
2007-06-01 16:10:44 · answer #3 · answered by TheatreFan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No... Camilla isn't even of royal or noble birth. Daina and her family has the purest of all bloods in the English Nobility because she is a direct descendant of King Charles II. So how can they be related? Camilla is not a blue - blood. She is just Charles' childhood - sweatheart who became his wife today. Camilla is just someone who Charles met in polo. Diana is of noble birth. Camilla isn't. Ever wonder why Camilla didn't have the title princess and only duchess.
2007-06-03 03:17:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, lol, they are not related or you would have read about it. Also, her mother married someone from the opposite side of the world, no relation at all.
Also, her great-grandmother was the kings wh*re (sorry, mistress) and the King left her enough Money when he died, that even Camilla was LIVING off the receipts STILL when she and Charles met!
2007-05-31 12:46:14 · answer #5 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Monarchy around the world are connected in one way or the other they keep marriage within the walls and should a commoner enter he has a short connection
2007-06-02 23:48:49 · answer #6 · answered by srracvuee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because then Diana and Camilla would have been related, and that wouldn't do at all...
2007-05-31 09:40:57 · answer #7 · answered by Cerebus_shun 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, but Charles and Camilla are related. Distantly!
2007-05-31 09:42:46 · answer #8 · answered by agneisq 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
who cares
2017-03-17 03:36:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares about Camilla she isnt a patch on Diana and dont think for a minute those two princes like her because they dont
2007-05-31 11:08:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋