A pecker. She looks more manly than Prince Charles.
2007-05-31 09:02:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
Princes Di was just used as an incubator to the British throne. Heck, what would been produced if Camilla had married him back than? Who know's but for certain, I must say that Prince Charles looks much happier these days. Even a king deserves happiness. Even if he is just a king in waiting he deserves some one that has the same attributions than him.
It' seems like that they fit each other perfectly. I m not sure why you're all so mean to Camilla. I agree their relationship was somewhat an un-natural affair. Nevertheless, Princes Di was just too young and to naive for such a prestiges relationship with Charles. Camilla has character, charisma and style. I know some of these attributes Princes Di had, but she just did not fit with Prince Charles. Camilla is a perfect fit . I wished he and her were allowed earlier on to get married.
2007-05-31 12:46:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by angelikabertrand64 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Camilla and Prince Charles have several of the same hobbies and causes. They have been friends for over 30 years and and know each other inside and out, complete trust. That's what Camilla had over Diana. Diana was young and wasn't ready for all of the attention that she got. Camilla is older, more mature and is secure in her relationship with her husband.
2007-05-31 09:36:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Julia B 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
The love of Prince Charles
2007-05-31 09:03:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by ☼ Latina Loca loves Yayo ☼ 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
Whilst I can't stand Camilla, and would cease to be a Royalist if she ever became Queen, there is no doubt whatsoever that there is a certain chemistry between her and Prince Charles...and whilst she may have loved him, that chemistry was something that was never between Diana and Charles that's for sure.
Sad but true...
2007-05-31 12:03:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by sarch_uk 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Why do people who know nothing about the subject insist on answering.
Lesley M...has said continually in her answer that Diana married Phillip. She has no clue but has still given a long answer giving "facts" she has no idea about.
Charles actually loves Camilla whereas he didn't love diana.
During their interview on BBC just after they got engaged the interviewer asked about them being in love. Diana immediately said "of course" but Charles just said "Whatever love is..." Not exactly what a young girl wants her fiance to say, is it?
2007-05-31 09:27:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Firstly Princess Diana was not perfect - far from it, she manipulated the press far more than any other member of the Royal Family.
What does HRH the Duchess of Cornwall have that Diana, Princess of Wales didn't?
Intelligence, common sense, respect of her peers, Prince Charles, self-respect, the list goes on and on.
The Duchess of Cornwall is a far better wife to Prince Charles than Diana ever was.
2007-05-31 22:48:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Love has nothing to do with physical attraction. Neither does "perfection", and Diana certainly wasn't perfect. When you meet your soul mate, you simply know, deep down within yourself. It's the other half that makes the two of you a whole.
Diana couldn't do that for Charles, Camilla does.
2007-05-31 09:36:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
First off you need to learn how to spell. The old bat didn't have anything on Princess Diana. Her ex Charles was an asshole period!
2007-06-03 19:57:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you actually believe that because Diana was physically appealing that made her perfect?
You do have a lot to learn.
Camilla had, and still has, the most important thing anybody could have. The one thing Diana never had.
Love between her and her husband.
2007-05-31 09:05:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Diana was beautiful. I don't know why Charles chose Camilla instead of her. Camilla's kind of ugly, but Charles is ugly too, so I guess they're perfect together.
2007-05-31 09:05:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋