Do you believe that the problems addressed in the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle can be overcome?
2007-05-31 08:33:42 · 5 answers · asked by Rance D 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
I think it's not the problem but in a sense recovers a little more information respect the objective randomness of quantum measurements. check this : measuring X on a state you obtain a random value ,measuring on a lot of identical state and taking the mean tou obtain di mean value of X ( . either if measuring a value of X or P is random Heisenberg principle gives you an extra information about their mean values!
2007-05-31 09:11:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Measuring P on the same state once you have randomness and on a lot of state you obtain
Strictly speaking the Heis. prin. goes in the opposite direction of OBJECTIVE RANDOMNESS OF QUANTUM MEASUREMENT that is at the heart of quantum mechanics (Heis prin. is a consequence).So you should overcome the randomness .
Well, if you're a Trekkie, then you'd have heard of the Heisenberg Compensator, that they use in their transporters.
However, I do not believe that this problem canbe overcome, because the theory is quite simple to understand. You can not know what every atom in your body is doing, or where it is located at any given time.
2007-05-31 09:01:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Problems? That's just the way it is. If it weren't that way, we wouldn't have the uncertainty principle. If you don't want to deal with it, then you will need do come up with a new theory independent of quantum mechanics that can accomplish the same predictions. Good luck!
2007-05-31 08:38:31 · answer #3 · answered by supastremph 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This concept applies to what we are able to appreciate in keeping with our centers for which to degree. you won't be able to equate our limited mind of the created with that of the endless mind and technique of the author. We knew no longer something one hundred fifty years in the past suitable to the easy cellular and all of its inner workings yet immediately with intense tech microscopes we are able to work out that for the time of each and each cellular is an entire entire international of structures maintained by those very small molecular machines. How will we assume, administration or influence any particle no longer to show subatomic yet we attempt to assume their life and phone and classify them in keeping with limited counsel and then practice those limits to the God that created all count before everything. How ostentatious of you.
2016-12-12 07:42:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no problems with HUP. There are problems with people's ability to grasp what it tells us, as our brains didn't evolve in an environment where quantum effects were readily observable.
2007-05-31 08:50:37 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋