Gore and other liberals are pushing to eliminate private choice in telecommunications by instituting the "fairness doctrine" thought the FCC. Under this doctrine, the government would regulate content of broadcasting stations to make sure they were politically "balanced" between left and right. Of course, the obvious problem with that is that the government decides what constitutes "balanced" broadcasting.
Isn't that what Chavez is doing in Venezuela? Is he the model for liberal thought in this country when it comes to interpreting the First Amendment?
2007-05-31
07:02:42
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Martin L
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Queen, thank you for your answer. If you disagree with my take on the Fairness doctrine, here are three links. I suggest you read them all.
First, a link that purports to be neutral:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
Next, an article in favor of the Fairness Doctrine:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2053
And, finally, an article against the Fairness Doctrine:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/EM368.cfm
I list all three in the interest of "balance," but also to show that no one on any side of this issue seems to disagree with my general characterization of the Doctrine. Some might disagree with the choice of words I use to describe it.
2007-05-31
07:35:07 ·
update #1