I definately find the current Bush administration revolting to say the least. Repulsive might fit better.
2007-05-31 06:01:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
1⤊
4⤋
maximum folk of people disliked the British simply by fact they made existence difficult on them. the U. S. replaced into doing each and every of the paintings and the British have been making a bunch of money off the U. S. because they had a monopoly on the commerce so very nearly each and every thing leaving the U. S. might flow directly to Britian and then they might sell it from there for a stable earnings. the U. S. only wanted to have some form of self government or some form of say in the British government simply by fact their have been thousands and thousands of human beings who have been compelled to stay decrease than British rule yet that they had no say in the direction the country might flow. Taxes have been the terrific straw even even though it had to do with far extra issues they disliked. It wasn't simply by fact they wanted to flow west and the British did no longer have a cope with the community individuals. they simply made bargains with the community individuals after the U. S. grew to alter into autonomous. They somewhat pronounced in the event that they fought the U. S. they might provide them weapons and money. 2/3's of people weren't against the revolution. The majoirty supported the alternative. there have been in straight forward terms a small sort of human beings who remained dependable to the British and this replaced into only simply by fact they theory their replaced into no way that the U. S. might desire to conquer them.
2016-10-09 04:56:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Revolt?
Against what?
Our Constitution (Hello? A Document) is our authority. Not individuals.
Is it your intent to revolt against:
"We, the people, in order to form a more perfect union..."?
The genuine trouble is that much of our populace is fooled by "rhetoric". The ONLY repair shall be restoration of priciples of truth & discipline of character.
Never think that a successful civilization can survive on any less.
2007-05-31 06:26:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by warmspirited 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't revolt in this country we go to the polls and vote the whole bunch out of office and put in a new set of people who will do the will of the people.
That may be the way you do it in Islamic countries but that isn't the way we do it here.
The best way to solve the problems is to revolt against the muslims.
2007-05-31 06:03:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by cloud 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Things have to get REALLY bad before revolution occurs. Most Americans, however, are relatively content. They may see corruption, but don't think it's bad enough to actually do anything about. No sever recessions, famine, bloodshed, so no need for extreme measures.
Oh, and we need representative government. The other options are dictatorship or anarchy...Neither are well suited for us.
2007-05-31 06:04:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Athena 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah. I'm betting you'll be really effective selling this message from a jail cell. I'll vote; you continue to incite treason; we'll see who has a better long term effect.
2007-05-31 06:00:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by wizjp 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
That makes about as much sense as the occassional calls for revolution you hear from the commies.
2007-05-31 06:01:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
That would be an American Revolution.No one wins. Are you a soldier???Of what power do you have or good things that you have done for our country.!!
2007-05-31 06:04:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by ♥ Mel 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
So, you're calling for revolt? I think that's illegal. I hope the feds are listening.
2007-05-31 06:00:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sheeps love to get slaughtered..
2007-05-31 06:05:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr. Spock 4
·
0⤊
0⤋