and let's not forget the clone war
http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/hflttww.html
In the following article I shall attempt to show, by a sequence of logical progression, that the rise in "Feminism" led directly to two disastrous world wars involving the death of 50-60 million people and many other adverse social and economic effects. The essay will attempt to address the underlying mechanisms – the big picture rather than the fine details – and makes the following assumptions: that humans evolved and that their characteristics must be expressed both individually and collectively to be evolutionarily viable.1
2007-05-31 05:25:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
I was ABOUT to read this, but I've decided that it's too early in the day to get pissed off and start WWIII.
2007-05-31 05:34:25 · answer #1 · answered by Thinking 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
After reading through about a fourth to a third of it, all I can say is: "GOOD GRIEF!"
I used to know a guy who thought my car was radio-active because it might have been parked near the Columbia River at some point in time before I bought it. He also claimed that he forgot to turn in a change of address when he moved because one of his uncles (who lived in another country and whom he'd only met a couple of times when he was a small child) could't type.
Doesn't make any sense, does it? But if you try hard enough and stretch your imagination far enough, I guess it's possible to connect ANY two events.
I mean, who'd have thought that having an obscure relative who couldn't type, decades ago and thousands of miles away, would cause someone to neglect turning in a change of address here in America in 2002?
Bizarre as it sounds, it is almost as believable as women's achieving basic human rights causing two world wars. eh?
Well, I have to close out of this discussion and get back to work because I had a Siamese cat for a pet when I was a kid, I fell out of a kayak last summer and I'm missing one hubcap on my van.
2007-05-31 06:55:12 · answer #2 · answered by monarch butterfly 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Possibly, but not for the reasons you state. I think it is because there were too few men to work in certain essential occupations or on the "home front", as they were all out on the battle lines; so, women had to fill traditionally male occupations and proved themselves capable of it- and probably didn't want to get rid of any new-found freedoms so quickly.
2016-05-17 21:24:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahahahahaha!
That's very funny.
Unfortunately, the document did not mention the clone wars.
Do you have any insights on the relation between feminism and the clone wars?
I thought it was all your fault.
Were not you assisting the Emperor?
2007-05-31 08:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by Nidav llir 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Feminism didn't lead to any wars. If anything, it was the men who started the wars in the first place.
2007-06-03 21:34:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You really do need to get a life. I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that Feminism caused the two world wars. Even after reading this article, your analysis is far fetched.
2007-05-31 06:09:09 · answer #6 · answered by sweetpea 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Oh, I'm sorry. I thought World War I was caused by Gavrilo Princip killing Franz Ferdinand, and that World War II was caused by Hitler. Thanks for enlightening me.
2007-05-31 10:36:59 · answer #7 · answered by Rio Madeira 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your question is not even a question but an agenda sermon and as such you are violating Yahoo Guidelines.
And you really ought to take off the silly mask and get a life.
2007-05-31 05:49:57 · answer #8 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
What happened to your manwhore son, Luki Streetwalker?
2007-05-31 05:53:59 · answer #9 · answered by Jasumi 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
it's a load of crap. And I read it.
evolutionairly viable?
2007-05-31 12:41:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋