Hilary is too and she is a liar who used NY for her own ambition. If you hate America and you love lies, self agrandizment and crime, vote for Hillary.
2007-05-31 05:12:30 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
1. Hilary was involved in the Whitewater fraud case
2. It is reported that Bill abused his position as governor of Ark. but having women caught violating traffic laws to his office / hotel room by the highway patrol so he could take advantage of them and dismiss their charges. This is criminal behavior if true.
3. it is reported that both Bill & Hilary had many affairs -sleezy people
4. Hilary insisted when she ran in NY that she had no aspirations for the presidency and was not using NY as a stepping stone - a liar! She did nothing for NY I don't care how many legislative sessions she attended.
5. An aide named Foster wasfound dead under very suspicious circumstances. Bill acted to limit and restrict the investigation - very suspicious - It is reported that Hilary was having an affair with Foster.
So, Hilary has not kept promises, was involved in a fraud case; may be implicated in a death; stayed with a man no matter how many wrong and henious things he did; has had affairs,
2007-05-31 07:11:12 · update #1
etc, etc. Look at her entire manner.......dripping with hostility. Holier than thou manner.
President Bush is a decent and religious man. He is not a womanizer. He is not afraid to say what he really thinks even if it is not politically expedient or popular. He really cares about America.
Hilary repeats politically correct catch phrases like a parrot, "it takes a village". Maybe she should go live in a village, preferably in Iraq.
2007-05-31 07:17:01 · update #2
to those saying they were never convicted.........neither was O.J.......do you want a president with all these clouds over them?
2007-05-31 07:21:23 · update #3
Because the general public dont think! I like to compaire the amarican population to sheep. The little sheep see the big sheep who looks very strong and they feel like they are powerful if they can be part of the strong sheep's group. Its just the way it is. If you havent noticed the morals and values of this country have been on a decline. It would only make since that the population would choose a corrupt person to lead them considering the population is mostly corrupt!
2007-05-31 05:36:23 · answer #1 · answered by Motorcycle randy 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because all of the things you mention came to nothing, after the millions of dollars and incalculable number of hours spent trying to prove criminal activity against the Clintons the Republicans couldn't even get an indictment. You mention OJ at the end? Please. OJ was indicted and tried in court, the Republicans couldn't even get enough evidence to indict either one of them on anything. Were the Clintons that smart or the Republicans that incompetent? Either way, it doesn't make the Republicans look good. These "clouds" of suspicion are clouds created by the Republicans that they could never prove. Vince Foster? That old chestnut has been debunked over and over again. Do yourself a favor and go to snopes.com. They've debunked the entire "Clinton Hit List." You do want to know the truth, right? If you are after the truth instead of conjecture you'll check on this, but I highly doubt it.
She did quite a bit for New York State. I've got a long list of her accomplishments and legislation in that state, but I won't bother to post them, because clearly you have no interest in the truth. Funny, for not being a good Senator for New York, she took 67% of the vote in the last election, including the majority of votes in Upper New York State, a Republican bastion.
You talk about lies, yet you post them here yourself. How credible does that make YOU?
2007-05-31 15:01:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the Clintons are criminals under your definition you must describe GW as the Mafia Crime Boss. The Clintons are self serving a**** but in the political sense. GW started a war of aggression that's led to 3200+dead US citizens. Using your logic he makes Charles Manson look like a Choir boy.
2007-05-31 17:41:20 · answer #3 · answered by Steve P 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So she went to New York to do a job, thousands of people do that every year:
Look up her attendance record and tell me she hasn't done her job for New York, compare her attendance record and participation in New York states doesn't beat out any of the contradictions you see with Giuliani's affairs (somehow less offenseive than Clinton's), Romney's flip-flopping, and McCain's general malaise about the world.
Come on, if you want to call people criminals, go ahead and list a crime that she committed.
By the way, no one move to this guy's state and try to get a job, he might think you're using the state for your own ambition (welcome to America, where we use everything for our own ambition).
When did I start to sound so Republican?
2007-05-31 13:46:30 · answer #4 · answered by Levi S 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I believe everyone has a right to their own opinion, but unless you can back it up with true facts, who's not to call you a criminal???
2007-05-31 13:27:41 · answer #5 · answered by kdauburnfan 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely right. And thank you for the information about Clinton's taking advance of women braking traffic laws.
2007-05-31 14:15:15 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
For the same reason that no one comprehends that the Bush Administration is criminal, led by GW himself.
You say tomato. . .
2007-05-31 12:53:09 · answer #7 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
How are they criminals again? We they convicted in a court of law, or in a court of La-La land?
2007-05-31 12:27:40 · answer #8 · answered by Waiting and Wishing 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Socialists always cover for other socialists.
2007-05-31 12:25:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What do you call the Pres. then?
2007-05-31 13:18:36 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋