English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

When you don't stand for God's Word, you'll accept anything.

2007-05-31 03:24:35 · answer #1 · answered by HeVn Bd 4 · 1 2

A clear thinking leftist is not defending a murderer but the rights all of us share with the murderer. for example: If the chain of evidence is corrupted in a police investigation, that problem has to be corrected, and the strictest and most meaningful response to the police or investigating authority is throw out that evidence so the underlying procedure changes for the next time. The next time could be you or me, wrongly accused. We want the evidence to be uncorrupted so it is there to exonnerate us. When the left goes after the death penalty, its because it has at times been wrongly applied, and when applied there is no correcting that mistake. As for unborn babies, I like them too.

2007-05-31 03:49:31 · answer #2 · answered by Eric 3 · 1 0

have you ever observed a minority crack addicted toddler at the instant? did no longer think of so. in case you fee the existence of the 'harmless unborn', why do you enable them to stay an entire life of ignore, poverty and the dislike the centers that would desire to help them, in the present day claiming it truly is 'welfare' for the 'leeches'? Its one element to do your Christian duty of combating an abortion, yet human beings such as you draw back after that and act as though each and every thing is high-quality. Will the 'harmless unborn' stay with worrying dad and mom? A healthful domicile? Will the new child strengthen up in an atmosphere that would sell crime and violence? you do no longer think of roughly that as long as you have performed your little 'holy duty'. in case you enable a new child to be born in an atmosphere like that, you're fullyyt responsible for his or her existence, extra so than the dad and mom. The day i desire to criminalize abortion is the day each and every new child in the U. S. is given an equivalent shot at existence. i understand realistically, we can't do this in the time of the mean time given the components to hand. it is the only reason i'm no longer against abortion. EDIT: don't get me incorrect, I do help the loss of existence penalty. I even have my own critiques unconstrained by skill of 'appropriate vs. Left'. yet evaluating the concern to killing the "harmless unborn" is pathetic.

2016-10-09 04:45:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

An unborn child is not a person. Let's concentrate on the ones we have. Why does it seem that some far-right people are happy for innocents to be killed in war, but agonize over these marginal cases?

Could there be some diversion from the real issues going on here?

2007-05-31 03:26:41 · answer #4 · answered by lakelounger 3 · 2 2

Care to name one? I didn't think so.

----------------------------

EinsteinsReal --

Don’t give me that holier than thou baloney. You don’t care about the unborn, or any, children. You are just following the doctrine of your brutally judgmental, humanity-hating, and sadistic God.

Why don’t you care that under George Bush, infant mortality in America has increased for the first time in 40 years? Here are the 2004 rankings.

NOTE: Cuba has a lower infant morality rate than the US.

http://www.unitedhealthfoundation.org/

Iceland
Singapore
Finland
Japan
Monaco
Norway
San Marino
Sweden
Belgium
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
France
Germany
Greece
Italy
Netherlands
Portugal
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
Australia
Austria
Canada
Ireland
Israel
Luxembourg
Malta
New Zealand
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom
Andorra
Croatia
Cuba
Estonia
United States of America

Why don’t you complain that Afghanistan and Iraq now rank the worse in infant mortality? According to a Save the Children report, “conservative estimates place increases in infant mortality following the 2003 invasion of Iraq at 37 percent. According to a 2005 report, one in eight Iraqi children—122,000 in all—died before reaching their fifth birthday. And of those that do not die, “one-fifth (21 percent) are severely or moderately stunted” as a result of malnutrition.

http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/05/4a3a9c3f-5a45-4287-99e3-3f6866bb2bfd.html

You do not complain because you do not really care about children.

--------------------------

Bush had a free ride for six years. The - slim -democratic majority is only a few months old. I love how you guys want to blame everyone else but never accept responsibility for your own actions.

The invasion of Iraq was illegal and immoral, and those who supported it have the blood of those murdered on their hands.

- The last time I checked, God was against that sort of thing.

2007-05-31 03:24:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

lack of conscience...lack of intelligence...lack of morals....lack of compassion...........take your pick




EDIT:

RAOUL DUKE:

How about.....Pelosi, James Carville, J. Kerry, Al Gore, Harry Mitchell , Obama, good try Raoul.....


EDIT:

Preston's Mama:
okay....so you are saying that no one has the right to say who lives and who dies right?.....what about the murderers....are you going to let them get away with choosing who to kill? Liberals are allowing people to kill absolutely innocent, pure, babies, that have killed/hurt NO ONE!....now on the other hand....conservatives, like myself, would like to rid this world of absolute trash such as the serial killers, mass murderers, and rapists.....hum....i wonder which death is more justifiable... the killing of an innocent..or the compensation of life bythe death penalty....heres a scenario for you.....lets say you were unable to have children....but then miraculously, you had one....a beautiful little girl.....a year later a murder comes into your house and strangles your child.........would you ever feel safe again if that person was still alive? nope....even if that person was in prison...theres still that small chance of them doing it again.....if not you, then someone else, possibly in the same situation as you......now tell me which one is justifiable.....there is always adoption for children that inconsiderate mothers dont want....why death?

EDIT:
Lakelounger:

what innocents are you talking about? the innocents that we are attempting to help out? the innocents that chose to fight and die if needed? ohhhhh, yea..those innocents...(catch the sarcasm?)
its hard to fight a war when 1/2 of congress (liberals) are against you, trying their best to force you to come back empty handed and with your tail tucked b/w ur legs.....

2007-05-31 03:21:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why do most rightist think it's ok to play God by deciding who is ok to kill and who isn't? I don't think either of these things is right but can't stand everyone thinking all democrats are baby killers (I know you said far-leftists but not everyone answered that way). P.s. Not every liberal is a non-christian to whoever made that comment.

2007-05-31 03:30:15 · answer #7 · answered by Ring Ring Ring Bananaphone 5 · 0 2

Well it all hinges on the definition of life really doesnt it?

It's a moral matter and each person should decide for themselves whether they feel life starts at conception or birth.

2007-05-31 03:24:07 · answer #8 · answered by planetmatt 5 · 0 1

Cuz they are stupid.

Oh well, at least they are the ones having the abortions by and large....fewer leftists in the future.....

2007-05-31 03:24:10 · answer #9 · answered by greengo 7 · 1 1

My mom said that if you go far enough left, you become radical right wing.

I don't know exactly what situation you're talking about, but I guess that's the solution.

2007-05-31 03:23:02 · answer #10 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers