English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-05-30 22:17:10 · 14 answers · asked by Jadochop 6 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

14 answers

There's the "official" conspiracy theory that 19 guys got on planes, told NORAD to stand down, flew hijacked planes around the busiest air space in the world for two hours then into buildings in the US Capitol and the most famous city in the world.

And then there's the conspiracy theory that actually fits the FACTS and evidence that points straight to the US GOVERNMENT.

Basic "Law and Order"...who benefited from the crime? Afghanistan? Iraq? or the Military-Industrial complex and OIL companies?

2007-05-30 22:39:04 · answer #1 · answered by Perry L 5 · 1 1

Ask yourself why the base of the twin towers burned for 100 days.Why Bush read the pet goat book[upside down] for a half hour after the attacks.Ask why it took 4 times as long to respond than usual.Ask why some companies had empty offices that day.Ask about the millions made off of put options.

2007-05-31 14:17:34 · answer #2 · answered by kitz 5 · 0 0

the most devastating terrorist attack every acted out on American soil which resulted in the deaths of thousands was "investigated" and "evidence" was produced and a "conclusion" was delivered all in the space of a few short months. They are still trying to determine who exactly killed Kennedy 40+ years later. The site was bulldozed and cleaned up in record time(you cant get potholes in streets filled in that quick)....conspiracy? i think so.

2007-05-31 05:22:27 · answer #3 · answered by coolred38 5 · 2 1

Uh, yeah, twenty guys from Saudi Arabia agreed to hijack planes and fly them into buildings. I'd call that a conspiracy.

2007-05-31 05:19:39 · answer #4 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 3 0

Was there a conspiracy to blow up the trains in Madrid, or London?
Who blew a hole in the port side of the USS Cole?
The African embassies? The Khobar towers? The Marine barracks in Beruit?

2007-05-31 05:35:13 · answer #5 · answered by Scarfgoat 2 · 1 2

I think the official version of events sounds so implausible if you really examine it, and there are so many unanswered questions, that the so-called conspiracy theories appear much more believable.

2007-05-31 05:23:16 · answer #6 · answered by SLF 6 · 1 2

Except a few people , nobody knows, those few people are silent and mouthshut.

What can we general public do, but speculate as all speculations in a COURT OF LAW are thrown out with ceremony.

2007-05-31 05:23:55 · answer #7 · answered by Syed M 3 · 2 1

There are several theories, but I, personally, don't think that any of them are true. The simple explaination is the real one.... Osama binLadin, is a extremist terrorist that wants to kill any and all Americans that he can. He doesn't care about anyone but himself and his views. He kills his own people, his own relatives. He chose massive public targets to create as much confusion and death as he possibly could upon US soil. I hope we catch that SOB, and that he is put to death for the thousands of murdered souls, whose blood is upon his hands.

2007-05-31 05:22:46 · answer #8 · answered by ravenna_wing1 4 · 4 1

Only to the mentally ill OR a Muslim trying desperately to either assuage the guilt or deflect the blame.

2007-05-31 05:19:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

i've always heard that if it looks like a duck, feels like a duck, acts like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck. there is so much evidence that points in all kinds of directions, with Bush's entire family being directly connected with Al-Queda, it's hard not to be suspicious. it's kind of like the landing on the moon theory. there is a lot of solid evidence that says we didnt ever land on the moon. and if we had, why havent we gone back????????

conspiracy? i dont know.

it stinks, and it doesnt stink like duck...

2007-05-31 05:19:31 · answer #10 · answered by BRobb 3 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers