Is multiculturalism morally right?

Question

I recently found out that by 2100, and maybe as early as 2073 according to more recent figures, white Britons will become a minority in their own homeland. Upon further research, I discovered that this is not only restricted to Britain but is something which all white nations will be facing in the coming century. White Americans, for example, will constitute 50% of the total US population by 2040 and only 25% by 2090!

In view of this, can multiculturalism be morally justified? Shouldn't all races/nationalities have a right to a homeland? I am puzzled as to why is this a problem which only white nations and all white nations are facing? I would appreciate any explanations, but if you are going to cry racism, please refrain from posting.

Thank you.

Sources: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,363750,00.html

http://www.usapopulationmap.com/

Nano – Justifying multiculturalism on the basis of allowing people to escape poverty is a flawed argument. Lets take the United States as an example. Every year, 1 million people from the third world enter America to seek a better life. That 1 million is replaced by 80 million births over deaths in the third world. We let another 1 million enter the following year, and that is replaced by OVER 80 million this time, and so on and so forth. Multiculturalism is not an effective tool in combating poverty in the third world as it only scratches the surface. Poverty is better combated in the third world itself. Watch the video below for a more graphic illustration of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ

Mikelew007 – Historical events cannot and should not be used as justification for the overpopulation of ANY race or nationality in their own homeland. Such a statement is basically saying, “your ancestors displaced the Native American, so let’s do the same to you”.
Chris A – You cite the alternative to multiculturalism as being “immoral”. Japan has so far resisted MASS immigration, like that which white nations are experiencing. Do you therefore view Japan’s actions as being immoral? Would be immoral if India didn’t accept 1 million non-Indians every year, even if the population didn’t want to?

Answer 1

Multiculturalism is exclusively anti-white. Yes, it is morally wrong. It is one thing to oppose white settlements and interference in the nations of non-whites, but it is quite another to demand that we give up our ancestral homelands to the third-world hordes in order to compensate for some imagined guilt on our part.


I feel compelled to quote Bob's Mantra:

"Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to 'assimilate,'i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

Answer 2

Like most western nations (the developed ones) and even a lot of the undeveloped nation, race and nationality are not the same thing. There is no color prerequisite to be British, or american, or French, or Russian. Only a few nations require that you can trace your heritage back to a root and then they will give you citizenhip (Israel comes to mind, but that is even starting to relax a little).

To restrict nationality to color or ethnicity would be to return to a colonial past, probably complete with slavery and other issues. One of the things about multiculturalism is that it says all ethnicities are as valued as all others, or that no single skin color is more important than any other. If all the colored people had to leave, doesn't that make the white people more important? Are white people more important?

Multiculturalism in this question is morally justified because it is immoral to consider the alternative.

Answer 3

ok, its not racism but its selfish if ur saying "live in ur country, leave mine alone"

just imagine what the world would be if selfishness exists when countries like US and UK are rich, MANY MANY other countries around the world are desperately needed help and the people cant wait to get a better life, and the only ONLY way to do that is by migrating to another better country to start OVER a whole NEW life, sometimes even leaving families and one own happiness behind just for the children's goods.

and whats good if there is no diversity anyway? dont you know the life your enjoying right now was contributed by many voices, races, and skin colors from all over the world

Answer 4

When was the last time you read a history book? The vast majority of migration in recent history ( over the last couple of hundred years) has been from European countries to other parts of the world. How do you think South Africa, the Americas and Australia wound up with people of European descent?

Answer 5

You can try to justify it the way you want it, IT DOESNT WORK.

It's an utopia. And secondly, why is it that only white nations have to deal with diversity? I see Asia and it's like 95% asian in there and no one is telling them to accept more "diverse" people cause it is too much "yellow".

The only multiculturalism that works is when it's applied inside the same race or civilisation.

So I think multiculturalism works, multiracialism not.

Oh and yeah, multiculturalism is basicaly an anti-white politics because it aims to decrease the white population and its influence.

Answer 6

I'm curious as to wonder what race has to do with morality.

I mean according to your statistics, by the time I am 56, white people in the U.S. will no longer be the majority; but it begs the question: What does that have to do with morality?

If you want to talk morality, maybe you should go into how white Americans and Europeans enslaved Africans and massacred the Native Americans in order to dominate the country and expand territory from coast to coast. Was that moral to enslave our fellow man? Was it moral to nearly wipe out an entire group of people who were technically here first?

Not crying racism, just asking a few questions...

Answer 7

It is interesting to me how those who most fervently espouse the beauty and necessity of diversity seem the most intent on its eventual destruction. Having it their way, our posterity will go to museums to learn that there was once distinct peoples upon the earth with unique cultures and characteristics.

Considering the fraternal warfare that has been a feature of European, Asian, African and Semitic cultures from pre-history to even today, there is no reason to speculate that a universal mono-culture will save humanity from itself.

Answer 8

Find a white chick and make a lot of babies if you're scared. That's about all you can do. I'm gonna be Black til the wheels fall off though.

Answer 9

first of all, no country is going to voluntarily give up land and genocide is wrong, there are no practical ways to do what you suggest. there is nothing wrong with dilutuing the gene pool, white is not necessarily right

what do you want - your own white island where only whites are allowed to live and ban all others from visiting ,so your white dna won't get spoiled?

Answer 10

Well, as long as the other people love and are loyal to the country they are in, there should be no problem.