English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I parked my car on resident’s property, where I reside with a valid resident's parking permit, which is visible. This decision to park in the parking lot was due to the street sweepings, which were to take place the following morning. I normally park on the street. The following morning I found my car impounded which management ordered. After management refused a courtesy warning to me through the tow company, management forced me to pay over $200 to retrieve my vehicle. When I file a claim in small claims, is it possible the property will be found liable?

2007-05-30 17:44:28 · 3 answers · asked by telly-tell 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

It depends. Does your parking permit give you the right to park anywhere or only in a specific assigned space? Did you maybe park someplace during the wrong hours or for longer than you should? Does your rental agreement in any way indemnify the management company? Are there specific instructions for what tenants are supposed to do when the streets are being swept?

Before you sue the management company you need to read your rental agreement and any pertinent parking policy and make sure you understand what your responsibilities and rights are. Just because you don't like what happened doesn't mean that the management company acted illegally.

2007-05-30 18:49:28 · answer #1 · answered by Nancy G 4 · 0 0

properly like Parsons stated, he took it as a compliment. With me, i could think of that NASCAR replaced into in simple terms sticking their noses in someplace else to reason greater issues and according to possibility avert me from making the subsequent race. like it or no longer human beings, start up and parkers are going to be their no count what. If it wasn't the 66 and the fifty 5 it could've been somebody else. i think of that it is variety of BS on account which you by no ability hear approximately nascar impounding a large funded communities vehicle, so why do it whilst one runs stable? i do no longer probably get it and prefer the article says. Its frustrating to locate sponsorship precise now and without that its frustrating to even build a race group, much less compete and take a inspect to make each and each race. I dont' see how else you're meant to construct a race group from the floor up without ton of sponsorship money. If issues could'nt have been so stable for thus long in NASCAR with sponsors there could be a ton of folk interior the region a number of those communities are in now. however the huge communities get exceeded hundreds of thousands of greenbacks by sponsors on suitable of what money the communities have already got everyday so its no project for them. i think of its crap incredibly. i'm hoping they make this weeks race and run stable and do the comparable element and turn nascar the fowl. I propose, i could incredibly desire to work out all 40 3 automobiles be aggressive and run the comprehensive race, yet that's unlikely to take place except NASCAR does some thing approximately it. And except they shrink down the sphere to fewer automobiles then it is going to by no ability take place. It does not take place in the different motorsports so why could between the main costly ones to be aggressive in have something distinctive. you could pass to an area short music and there is often that one or 2 perhaps 3 automobiles or greater that in simple terms don't have the money to offload of their automobiles as a results of fact the others and that they are slower. They spend hundreds on their automobiles and NASCAR is managing hundreds of thousands. so which you tell me.

2016-12-12 07:09:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Negligence was committed by the personnel of your apartment by not informing you prior to the impounding of your car. Thus, you can even file a reimbursement for their negligence.

2007-05-30 18:43:35 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers