Being self employed, I don't need to pass any tests, but this question was sent to me by an aquaintance. Seems like a great idea to me, so naturally that means libs will hate it:
Like a lot of folks in this state I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.
In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test, with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do on the other hand have a problem with helping someone sit on their ***. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them??
2007-05-30 15:26:34 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BTW, I would have no problem passing such a test.
2007-05-30 15:41:22 · update #1
I've heard this before and I think its fair, I don't want my hard earned money going to support someone's drug habit! I know liberals will say violation of privacy, but if they don't want their privacy violated, they don't have to have our money.
2007-05-30 15:39:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
careful now, you are going to get some people really upset with your sound logic.
Seriously, socialists believe it would be an invasion of these peoples privacy, regardless, unless of course the socialists wanted someone to take a test, you see the simple hypocrisy of it all.
And I have to agree with one of your answerers, it is not democrats perse or even liberals
the enemy is within, they are socialists, they have bought and paid for the democrat party, and they call themselves liberals because they know certain idiots would not follow them if they told the truth, that they are communists seeking to destroy this country.
For all of you real libs and dems, if you do not want the criticism that people like this poster or myself hurl at you, get rid of the socialists in the dem party, get them to stop using the label liberal or come up with your own. As long as you are in bed with them you are calling to called to task as well.
2007-05-30 16:50:22 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Now why did you have to take a jab at the "Libs", you pose a good question. I agree there should be more restrictions to obtain welfare--however--you must then be prepared to expand the system to offer drug rehab and counseling. This is a good thing--you will then find them a job and provide housing while they get their feet on the ground. You will help many family's to overcome the welfare drug problem. I like it, are you a lib?
2007-05-30 16:08:35 · answer #3 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
T D,so it seems your trying to make sense out of a senseless society. What your asking would take LAZY government workers to accomplish another task while in the mean time can't accomplish the task they were hired to do. The ones your referring to went to collage on your money then got a job that pays with your money and were hired because they were a minority yet had no idea of what they job task was. It's really no different from what happened during the 50's when most were hire because of their race and sex, seeing they had no skills beyond skinning pigs and milking cows. Good ole boy BS just takes on a different scenario, but the mentality is the same. Your question is raciest and sexiest and questions even those that are (according to Hitler, the supreme race, although they are as STUPID as those they compare themselves to. To answer your question, piss when your told collect your paycheck, vacation at the coast and keep your mouth shut, because NOBODY GIVES A S##T
2007-05-30 15:59:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
I didn't really care for the "libs will hate it" comment because broadbrush strokes like have gotten us exactly nowhere. But as a Democrat, yes I agree with you.
2007-05-30 16:24:33 · answer #5 · answered by douglas l 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think they should pass more than a urine test! I can hear the libs screaming right now. discrimination, it unconstitutional.
2007-05-30 15:38:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
all welfare recipients SHOULD have to pass a urine test. if it's good enough for the taxpayers who EARN the money, it is good enough for the slackers in our society.
2007-05-30 15:31:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should
Hmm, Johs03 sounds like he would fail the test and not
get his welfare check.
2007-05-30 16:08:21 · answer #8 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes they should!
Edit: I knew of one girl who was on state aid, including food stamps, cash benefits, housing assistance and medical insurance.Simply because she had a child. This unfit mother would leave her son in her living room and go into her bathroom and get high with random men.
So yes I have a problem with those types of people not having to take a drug test.
2007-05-30 15:29:17 · answer #9 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 8⤊ 3⤋
Great idea,to bad politicians don't have to take one!!Teddy would be out on the street begging for change.
2007-05-30 15:40:49 · answer #10 · answered by ak6702 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋