Shouldn't Bush close the US Borders before declaring himself dictator in the event of another "terror attack"?

Question

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHI20070521&articleId=5720

Or would they actually love to see another attack so they can implement Marshall law and suspend the US Constitution ?

Obviously that is more along the lines of what they are trying to accomplish...

all these answers are so mindless I can't even pick a best of the worst- they are just that bad.

Answer 1

No. you have just demonstrated how ignorant the misguided can be.

Answer 2

you're appropriate on all 3 element's,our super chief DUBYA choose for's all 3, and has worked for that, yet too stupid to make certain the thank you to end off the tri partite schedule. So now he's questioning why the mass's of yank's and the international think of he's a stink human, whilst all he needed exchange into to sell his stupid non secular fanaticism, and what he theory exchange into justice for saddam's assasination attempt on ghw Bush. He choose for's to be king, no longer dictator. His non secular view's, have topped him already, and no count if he exchange into's henry viii traditionally or Nixon, is moot.

Answer 3

Bush isn't going to suspend the Constitution, but it is interesting because I wondered if Clinton might do the same thing during his presidency. Looking back, the only basis I had for thinking that way is that I hated Clinton as much as you apparently hate Bush. In my case, I lightened up.

Answer 4

First of all it is Martial Law (as in Military Law), not Marshall Law. And no president has the ability under our form of government to declare him/herself dictator. All that being said, the borders should be closed with provisions for legal entry and exit points.

Answer 5

A little border security certainly wouldn't hurt. Bush seems to be dead set against any semblance of border security, though, as you can see from his support for the Amnesty Bill.

Anyway, you'll see soon enough whether Bush has designs on dictatorship, or whether he relinquishes office to the inevitable Democratic victor of the '08 election...

Answer 6

Bush knows there is little danger of a terror attack. That's why he hasn't secured the border. He plans to make a North American Union out of Mexico, USA and Canada. He is pushing to pass this amnesty bill that will allow gangs, criminals and illegals full immunity within 24 hours. He has already trashed the constitution.

Answer 7

Let me guess, your an democratic alarmist. Making up stupid questions based on outright lies.
OH NO! Bush dropped a pencil, we have to impeach him right now!
Are you the mysterious "sources in the Bush Administration" that the media refers to all the time?

Answer 8

if we closed the borders, our economy would be worse off than it is. the illegals are taking all the jobs no body wants, thus making this society possible. they do it for dirt cheap, and they do it well. As i said before, our economy would be in trouble if bush closed the borders

Answer 9

Eisenhower's Operation ******* Closed the border.
OPERATION *******. Operation ******* was a repatriation project of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service to remove illegal Mexican immigrants ("wetbacks") from the Southwest. During the first decades of the twentieth century, the majority of migrant workers who crossed the border illegally did not have adequate protection against exploitation by American farmers. As a result of the Good Neighbor Policy, Mexico and the United States began negotiating an accord to protect the rights of Mexican agricultural workers. Continuing discussions and modifications of the agreement were so successful that the Congress chose to formalize the "temporary" program into the Bracero program,qv authorized by Public Law 78. In the early 1940s, while the program was being viewed as a success in both countries, Mexico excluded Texas from the labor-exchange program on the grounds of widespread violation of contracts, discrimination against migrant workers, and such violations of their civil rights as perfunctory arrests for petty causes. Oblivious to the Mexican charges, some grower organizations in Texas continued to hire illegal Mexican workers and violate such mandates of PL 78 as the requirement to provide workers transportation costs from and to Mexico, fair and lawful wages, housing, and health services. World War IIqv and the postwar period exacerbated the Mexican exodus to the United States, as the demand for cheap agricultural laborers increased. Graft and corruption on both sides of the border enriched many Mexican officials as well as unethical "coyote" freelancers in the United States who promised contracts in Texas for the unsuspecting Bracero. Studies conducted over a period of several years indicate that the Bracero program increased the number of illegal aliens in Texas and the rest of the country. Because of the low wages paid to legal, contracted braceros, many of them skipped out on their contracts either to return home or to work elsewhere for better wages as wetbacks.

http://www.tsha.utexas.edu/handbook/online/articles/OO/pqo1.html

Bush's terror gangs of Los Zetas and their handlers, the US government, flood the streets of the US with more drugs and killing innocent people in cold blood.

Mexican Soldiers Freelancing for Drug Cartels on US Soil
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200612/NAT20061221a.html

Answer 10

I don't think it's possible to close the borders, per se. We are headed for monarchy, to be sure but, I don't see that happening in our lifetime.

Answer 11

he is not trying to be dictator --- stop with all the conspiracy theories.
but i do agree the borders --- mexican and canadian --- should be guarded, have video surveilance, and a big beautiful fence.