Of course not what kind of question is that. Bush has only killed 4,000 US Soldiers and responsible for the deaths of 3,000 civilians in the World Trade Centers. That would come out 7,000 deaths but in total including Iraqis and Afghanis probably like 15,000. Stalin killed 10 million while Hitler took a mere 6 million. Bush is only in the little leagues compared with the other tyrants. Bush is bad but Hitler and Stalin were way worse. Bush hasn't abused the American people as much either he has lied to them and misled them into war but not on the levels of Stalin and Hitler. Heil BUSH HEIL LIL BUSH! LOL!
2007-05-30 12:29:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by NONAME 4
·
0⤊
6⤋
More bloodshed than Nazi Germany and the USSR combined? Um, what?
"By the time Himmler ordered a halt to the shooting in the fall of 1942, they had murdered approximately 1,500,000 Jews." - University of San Francisco
Not even CLOSE to that number died in Iraq as a result of Bush's policies. This 1,500,000 figure doesn't include all the deaths of World War II across Europe or the hundreds of thousands+ who died during Stalin's purges.
You are an idiot.
2007-05-30 19:28:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by TheOrange Evil 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
You have no idea how many people died in the Nazi concentration camp, right? You have no idea how Nazi ran the country, right? You have no idea how many people died in the hands of SS under USSR, right?
For one, Do you know how many soldiers died when Russia was trying to take over Berlin?
FYI, any of the numbers listed above are greater than the death in Iraq by god-knows-how-many-folds.
Please do NOT use examples when you have no idea about those examples
2007-05-30 19:31:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by DeadManWalking 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
"Does America currently have it's version of an Hitler or Stain in Political Power?"
Yea, it's called the DNC. They are forcing their will on everyone just like Hitler did.
2007-05-30 19:30:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Would you please provide your evidence that proves that Bush "has caused more blood shed then Nazi Germany or the USSR combined?"
I am not a Bush supporter, but your "question" is inaccurate.
2007-05-30 19:28:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
carol? you're F'in insane...more bloodshed that the socialists or commies COMBINED? i dont' see gulags full of millions of people starving to death? where are those death camps, err happy camps? i don't see any showers errr gas chambers fired up with millions dead....100's of millions murdered by socialists and commies in less than 30 years from 1932-1962...you're clinically insane and should be put in an institution.
2007-05-30 19:29:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
well since ADOLPH RUMFIELD quit
and chenney wont run for president
Bandito Gonzalos is still wire tapping
and the HAlibrton corporation is headqaurters in
BEN LADENS HOME STATE
that would be facism
2007-05-30 19:51:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You're kidding right? You cannot even compare the three. It's people like you that make the rest of the world hate us, comparing our president with mass murderers who killed out of hatred and anger. Our president is on a mission to provide stability and prosperity in Iraq. Slowly, but surely, that's what he is accomplishing, every minute.
2007-05-30 19:27:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by girlonfire *White Sox Pride* 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
You're an example of why some kids go to community college, and others have to actually prove their merit to get into a good school.
Go back and try again dumbass
2007-05-30 19:29:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by aucf61 1
·
2⤊
3⤋
you are either a 10 year old or an extremely uneducated and ignorant fool. every time you post you demonstrate your ignorance.
2007-05-30 19:53:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mon-chu' 7
·
2⤊
1⤋