English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Before the big bang there was nothing,nothing with a potential,a finite potential.
A single-space time pulse was initiated.
It accelerated outward increasing in density for one thirty-billionths of a second the acceleration stopped the radial expansion reached the speed of light.
At this time the entity was the size of a plum,with incredible density.
There was no matter,no gravity,no electro-magnatism.
The quantum effect permeated the entity and would cause this primordial egg to evolve into the universe we live in to-day.

2007-05-30 12:41:05 · answer #1 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0 1

You've misunderstood the reference. What it meant was that if the mass of a golf ball was turned into energy (E=mc^2) and that energy was compressed into a Planck volume (very very small) then you would have sufficient conditions for a big bang (minus the initial singularity). The real difficulty is compressing anything to a Planck volume. I should also point out how irritating it is when people who know nothing (everyone above me) try to answer these questions.

2007-05-30 09:31:48 · answer #2 · answered by mistofolese 3 · 0 1

To Josh - - Your point is often raised. However, there are spinning machines that are seen at carnivals that will spread paint on a disc to appear not much different than some impressionist painters' works. The real question is: How do you logically go from "someone painted it" to "same thing for the universe"? Can you scientifically explain why it is the same thing?

2007-05-30 10:06:34 · answer #3 · answered by Renaissance Man 5 · 0 0

I think as the mass expanded from the big bang it did so intitially at the speed of light and by doing that the mass increased so it wasnt that all of the mass in the universe was in a small space it was just relesed at a speed that caused the mass to grow. I think ive even heard that at the beging it traveled faster than the speed of light.

2007-05-30 18:43:34 · answer #4 · answered by chingow 2 · 0 2

the possibility is that it is possible. just because we have not found it, nor experienced it, nor touched it, does not mean that it doesn't exist. I figure that a scenario of which you are speaking would most likely be the end of this universe at a new birth of a universe.

2007-05-30 09:23:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Such an idea is inconceivable. Such energy can not be found anywhere in the universe.Even if the big bang theory is correct, why has it not "banged" yet?

2007-05-30 09:19:20 · answer #6 · answered by manunitedk 3 · 0 1

I refuse to believe that "nothing" exploded and became "everything."

Lets use scientific method on this.

Hand 50 scientists a painting.
Give them a week.
Ask them how the painting came to be.
Guarantee you that they'll all say that "someone painted it."

Same thing for the universe.
Just as statistically impossible for the universe to just "come into being" than it is for a painting to come together on its own.
Must have had a Creator ;)

2007-05-30 09:23:08 · answer #7 · answered by Josh 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers