choosing between capitalism and socialism.........?

Question

if you could choose what gov you could live in, what would you choose and why? or would you choose a different gov independent of capitalism and socialism?

Answer 1

Capitalism.

That way, their will eventuall only be 1 leader.

ME

Answer 2

I've said it before, and I'm sure I'll have to say it again.

Liberalism =Socialism.
Socialism = Communism Lite.

Communism Doesn't work...Never has.
Socialism Doesn't work...Never has.

Capitalism isn't perfect....no Human system (or system involving humans) can >EVER< be.
But it encourages innovation, the striving for excellence, and hard work. None of the other forms of government do that.

T.S.

Why is it so hard to look at all of Our world's previous history, and >NOT< make the same mistakes OVER!,and OVER! AGAIN?

Answer 3

Socialism in pure form doesn't work in large groups (like larger than a few hundred people) because there's no incentive to innovate, be efficient, or work hard (this is IGNORING the political "communist" element... I'm assuming a free socialist state where the government owns the means of production but otherwise doesn't control people's lives).

Capitalism is extraordinarily cruel to its underclass. It's usually an innovator, powerful, and rich, but that richness is concentrated in the hands of a few (although not as few as in, say a communist country or a monarchy).

That's why I like the American system -- capitalistic with a socialistic safety net... I would probably prefer the USA a little farther to the left (better, free education, universal health care, etc.) but I'm not complaining too much.

Yay USA.

Answer 4

If I could choose, I would choose capitalism without govenment interferrence as we now have. Why? People should be rewarded for their efforts, not artificially as in our present society. Socialism is saying that every one is to be provided for even if they do nothing to care for themselves. I definitely do not like that. Capitalism comes closest to making people responsible for their own actions (the U.S. has been becoming more and more socialistic for decades).

Answer 5

Capitalism of course.

Socialism is immoral, and evil, it seeks to corrupt the moral fiber of the western culture, to turn it upside down with a socialist proletariat at the top, which of course is the new Democratic Party, or democratic secular socialists.

which of course brings us to multiculturalism, or the destruction of AMerica.

Answer 6

America is the only country in the world where the poor people are fat.

I think I will take capitalism.

edit: Katerina, I buy bananas for 59 cents a pound. A one pound bag of potato chips costs $3.69. I make my lunch before work everyday, I buy a pound of turkey a loaf of bread and cheese for about $10 a week. Most "value" meals at a fast food place cost at least $6 for just one day.

It is cheaper in this country to eat a healthy diet than a bad one.

Answer 7

I agree with Johnny. OUR American system isn't perfect (by far!). There's so many details that need some serious changes. However, if everything within our system was perfect, I'd have to go with capitalism. I like the idea of competition. I just don't like the idea of corruption.

Answer 8

As a rule the workers choose capitalism so they'll be rewarded for their efforts and the non-workers choose socialism so others will have to work to provide them with benefits.

I work so I'll go with capitalism.

Answer 9

I'm a dyed in the wool capitalist. I have never been shown anything that was inviting or beneficial with socialism, economically or for the human spirit. Socialism kills both.

Answer 10

Capitalism = inner maximum possession of the skill of production, workers are exploited by skill of their bosses by skill of no longer receiving their finished culmination of their hard paintings. workers are no longer paid in finished. Socialism = worker administration of the skill of production, workers democratically run the economy, workers are rewarded in keeping with how plenty paintings has been performed. Communism = A stateless, classless society, money does not exist in communism. Like socialism yet one does not get compensated in my opinion for ones attempt. Mutualism = An financial concept, it truly is a unfastened-marketplace socialism. it truly is in keeping with a hard paintings concept of fee that holds that once hard paintings or its product is bought, in substitute, it might desire to obtain products or centers embodying "the quantity of hard paintings mandatory to produce an editorial of precisely comparable and equivalent application". Receiving something much less would be considered exploitation, theft of hard paintings, or usury. once you're making one hundred toys, you obtain one hundred% decrease back of in spite of those one hundred toys are truly worth from how long it took to cause them to on the unfastened-marketplace, in assessment to in capitalism the place you obtain much less in reimbursement simply by fact your boss makes money off of the paintings you have performed. (it is the place earnings comes from) State Capitalism = What the jap Bloc truly replaced into.. State administration of the skill of production, working type is governed by skill of a bureaucratic, privileged elite, neither unfastened marketplace capitalism nor socialism/communism. And regrettably what maximum folk somewhat think of of whilst they think of of socialism/communism. Socialism has on no account existed simply by fact in the international places that have referred to as themselves socialist there has on no account been workers administration of the skill of production! only state capitalism!