30 years of tight centralized rule was laid open to insurgents, after we made up to 400,000 people unwaged overnight....
Not very smart, was it?
2007-05-30 06:26:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No but George Bush is commander and chief so what did you expect?
2007-05-30 06:56:41 · answer #1 · answered by Open your eyes 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, it was very stupid and unnecessary. disbanding the military and dismantling the government were huge mistakes. destroying the buildings, bridges, electrical grid, water plants and other basic infrastructure was not necessary to defeat the iraqi army. it seemed like rumsfeld just wanted to try out all of the expensive weapons that we had. he was like a child on christmas with a lot of new toys to try out.
we just made one helluva mess, and created much suffering that was not necessary to get rid of saddam.
2007-05-30 06:38:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What would you expect from a Cowboy hick? Insight and planning?
"heck, he don't have time fer nun a that, ya jus gotta act an foller yer gut with these invasin/war do-dads "
2007-05-30 13:18:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
name something about this war that was smart. oops, now I get to hear from all those that will name killing Saddam as a smart thing to do. If that was so smart, why is it that there was less chaos, less death, less destruction in Iraq when Saddam was in charge.
2007-05-30 06:33:13 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What else you expect from a stupid guy like bush?
2007-05-30 06:32:41 · answer #5 · answered by BushSupporter 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
going to war wasn't very smart either.
2007-05-30 06:32:15 · answer #6 · answered by dover56dover 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
STILL "answering" your own rhetorical "questions", are we, Hummy?
2007-05-30 06:35:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No.
2007-05-30 06:30:33 · answer #8 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋