English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Japanese loves to hunt whales and we have the largest herd of whales in the world. My neighborhood alones has probably fifty 300 pounders.

If we give the Japanese license to hunt whales in the US, wouldn't that solve the problems of both countries; they get the whales they want(ours is probably better than the real blubber) and we get to reduce our insane population of whales that is killing our health insurance system( raising those insane premiums).

The Japanese wants to raise the humpback whale quota to 100 a year. At 80,000lb per whale, that should take care roughly 300 whales in our country per humpback.

Please write to your senators and representatives to get this motion going.

2007-05-30 05:23:36 · 3 answers · asked by Pazzy G 1 in Politics & Government Politics

3 answers

Interesting, a very original proposal. It just might work.

2007-05-31 03:41:47 · answer #1 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0 0

nicely, i'm undecided that something says that wellness care is an exact persay, in spite of the actual shown fact which you may desire to discover it interior the 9th modification or liberty pastime interior the fifth and 14th. yet there is not something there that announces they are able to't offered it. yet while your 2d question as to the place it says the government has the the terrific option to take your money to grant others with wellness care, no that for the duration of all possibility isn't interior the invoice of Rights (the 1st ten amendments) yet you may desire to discover it interior the bigger shape. the government can "scouse borrow" your money: Article a million section 8 subsection a million of the form and the sixteenth modification. the government can spend it on wellness shield somebody else (or any regularly occurring welfare) Article a million, section 8, Subsection a million and Article a million, section 8, Subsection 18. --- edit; observe: existence Liberty and persuit of happiness isn't interior the consitution, that's the announcement of independence, and that's non-binding. And, the consitution does not set up a undeniable economy different than we've the the terrific option to assets, yet only via the due technique of regulation.. so, assets could be taken, see you later because it quite is taken via due technique.

2016-12-30 07:15:25 · answer #2 · answered by graney 3 · 0 0

Right there with ya on that one! Why stop with the Japanese, though? Why not grant licenses to U.S. citizens? There are plenty of people in the Ozarks and Appalachians that have both the motivation and the resources to hunt whales domestically.
Their own insurance needs could be subsidized (or at least supplemented) by the imposition of a "per ton" bounty funded by realized savings to the insurance companies.

2007-05-30 05:32:36 · answer #3 · answered by Klawed Klawson 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers