i say quest field in seattle. State of the art stadium,great atmosphere and a superbowl in the northwest, or when its finished Lucas oil stadium in Indy (which lost the 2011 bid)
2007-05-30 05:04:21 · 22 answers · asked by Mr. D 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I would like to see it at Lambeau Field. It is one of the most historic stadiums, and there would be a good chance that the weather would play a part in the outcome. I get tired of seeing it be perfect weather or indoors every year. I say make those fat cats who pay 1000 per ticket sit out in the snow.
2007-05-30 05:09:10 · answer #1 · answered by ♠KPT STYLE♠ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you're talking about a stadium there are lots of nice ones..living close to Seattle I can tell you that Qwest is beautiful but I can also tell you that Seattle in January is NOT the place you wanna have the Super Bowl. Ideal city is San Diego but the stadium is old. So if I had to pick a combination of facility and city it would be Tampa or this years host Phoenix.
2007-05-30 05:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Chuck 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Superbowl should be played in Hawaii every year. There are numerous reasons for this:
1. This is a guaranteed neutral site for both teams because Hawaii doesn't have an NFL team;
2. It would be a fabulous vacation site for Superbowl attendees;
3. It could be a hellacious week of partying by having the Superbowl there and then the Pro Bowl the following week;
4. Who wouldn't want to go to Hawaii???????
2007-06-02 21:36:16 · answer #3 · answered by zoomcurly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have people that talk about the weather being nice in order to host the Super Bowl, you have people talk about things to do around the city, you have people talk about historic stadiums.....then you have people that talk out of their *** and ignorance of buissiness (PACKER FAN). If i'm going to pay money out the butt to watch THE football game, i better have places to party leading up to the game, i better have great weather to tailgate before the game, i better have places to visit after the game...i better have an easy time finding a place to live for a few days/week, i better watch the game in a stadium that's in no way falling apart, doesn't smell like dirty laundry and stale beer (lambeau), and facilities that substantially reduce ALL lines to be waited in...... Natuarally i would choose Chicago EXCEPT for the fact that in Feb the weather will suck (has everything else though)... you want the whole package, you go to Arizona. Brand new stadium, retractible roof....retractible FIELD for cryin' out loud!! I was there to watch the monday night miracle of Chicago comming back to beat Arizona last year,......those fans are spoiled rotten (if you leave out the team that is).
2007-05-30 05:21:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really bothers me that the NFL won't have Superbowls at northern outdoor stadiums. I mean think about it. You could have a NFC or AFC Championship game in mid-January at Lambeau Field, Soldier Field or Giants Stadium. But you'll never have a Superbowl there two weeks later? It's ridiculous. Every NFL city should have the opportunity to host a Superbowl.
2007-05-30 05:11:16 · answer #5 · answered by Countdown 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
hi. i'm information superhighway hosting the superbowl this twelve months. I took an interest in this weird and wonderful American obsession and desperate that if I have been given in touch i could have the flexibility to examine greater approximately it. So I volunteered. of course i'm somewhat worried as I basically have a one bedroomed flat and that i think of i could could desire to get my Auntie in to do the catering. Any useful suggestions from human beings could be very much liked. additionally, suspect the queue for the bathing room would be horrendous.
2016-10-30 05:18:33 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Snyder Family Stadium in Manhattan, Kansas
2007-05-30 11:19:11 · answer #7 · answered by Nathan T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like to see superbowl in pacific northwest, not sure what NFL feels about Seattle hosting superbowl there. I have a hunch that one of two things on city hosting superbowl includes:
a) weather
b) things to do in your city...mostly entertainment places...even strip club, bars, clubs, restaurants, luxury hotels etc..
2007-05-30 05:10:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Soldier Field in Chicago should be it's permanent site. The weather is right for football , the city can easily handle any amount of visitors and The NFL would be honoring one of it's founding fathers in the person of George S. Halas.
Lambeau Field would be my second choice.
2007-05-30 06:35:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Somewhere in the north outside. Preferably with some snow.
Dont be a cry baby Jimmy. They can dress warm and be just fine watching the game in the cold. A real fan goes for the game not the nice weather and outside entertainment.
2007-05-30 05:46:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋