At least He could explain some things he missed the first time around.
2007-05-30 03:57:55 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
He didn't need to. Like they say on the Prego commercials - "it's all in there"!
2007-05-30 04:00:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question...
He didn't miss much! And, a sequel would be ignored, misapplied and taken out of context as the original.
2007-05-30 04:05:14 · answer #2 · answered by nah123 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because sequels are never as good as the original
2007-05-30 04:01:38 · answer #3 · answered by elizaday83 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you actually read the Bible, there is no need for a sequel.
2007-05-30 04:02:11 · answer #4 · answered by jignutty 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well, the qu'ran written by the last great prophet mohammed is somewhat of a sequel. lots of stuff that is in the bible, but some new stuff too.
2007-05-30 04:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by joe 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think you’re mistaken, God didn't write the bible. He was illiterate and needed other people to tell his /her story, so he got some assistant’s. Besides he probably meant it all as a joke..... That damn sarcastic bastard!
2007-05-30 04:24:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
God didn't write the bible.
2007-05-30 04:02:49 · answer #7 · answered by aMUSEd 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unnecessary.
2007-05-30 04:00:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He lost the movie rights, so he didn't want Hollywood to profit off of it.
2007-05-30 04:01:17 · answer #9 · answered by Ghimraab 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He did, Old Testament= part one
New Testament= part two
2007-05-30 04:08:10 · answer #10 · answered by whos_ur_girl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋