English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Organisms can interact with both living and nonliving parts of the natural world.What do you call interactions between two living organisms?

2007-05-30 03:07:39 · 6 answers · asked by jessica_stay 1 in Science & Mathematics Biology

6 answers

an ecosystem

2007-05-30 03:11:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Interaction between any biotic and abiotic bodies or organism is called ECOSYSTEM

2007-05-30 03:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by smart_shailendra 2 · 0 0

There are mainly 3 types :
1. Prey-Predator

2. Symbiosis
2.1 Commensalism
2.2 Mutualism
2.3 Parasitism

3. Competition
So which one are you referring to?

2007-05-30 03:28:16 · answer #3 · answered by Ch'ng 3 · 0 0

"How did we get a living cellular out of nonliving rely?" the answer to this question belongs to a distinctive concept in a distinctive scientific discipline. Abiogenesis is a ingredient of molecular biology. Experiments have shown that, under the atmospheric situations of the extra youthful earth, this is extremely a possibility for amino acids or maybe nucleobases to have emerged certainly. once you talk approximately that life, at its maximum undemanding is basically chemistry, the belief of emergence does not look so a techniques-fetched. "Genetic code is judicious in its duplication. " No, it is not. .5% of your genome is created from mutations and you benefit extra as your cells replace themselves. that's partly by using a phenomenon reported as "wobble" is which tRNA will especially situations bond to a codon it does not thoroughly correspond with. "the subsequent immensely problematic leap of religion one ought to take to have faith in evolution is the leap from one-celled organisms to multi-celled organisms" there are a number of species of the dominion Protista that are multicellular. some slime molds circulate from unicellular to colonial to multicellular as element of their life cycles. that's relatively no longer a leap of religion in any respect. "it could look uncomplicated to have faith that a frog ought to evolve right into a toad" using difficulty-unfastened names journeys up a large type of folk while speaking approximately evolution. to illustrate, there is not any phylogenetic difference between a frog and a toad. that's significant to understand phylogeny with the intention to trance branches interior the evolutionary tree. "Evolution does not clarify what kinds of species lie between fish and amphibians, amphibians and reptiles," this may be a difficulty-unfastened false impression, amphibians did no longer branch off into reptiles. "reptiles and birds" Birds are reptiles. they are the only extant contributors of the clade Dinosauria. returned, phylogeny is significant. "birds and mammals" Mammals did no longer branch from birds. Mammals share a difficulty-unfastened ancestor with reptiles. "mammals and self sustaining human beings" human beings are mammals. "why are not there any nevertheless interior the potential of evolving?" All species are continuously evolving. "each accepted organism that has ever lived has extra healthful nicely right into a very particular group with actual no exceptions." on account that's what we invented communities for. there has been life for plenty longer than there has been taxonomy.

2016-11-23 17:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by parise 4 · 0 0

it called symbiosis in general.

it is mutualism if both party gain profit.
it is parasitic if one profit, but the other being disadvantaged.
it is comensalism if one profit, and the other neither gain profit or being disadvantaged.

2007-05-30 03:13:09 · answer #5 · answered by seed of eternity 6 · 1 0

Flirting :)

2007-05-30 03:15:07 · answer #6 · answered by jon_mac_usa_007 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers