yep....great way to describe it!
2007-05-28 23:54:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by dianehaslegs 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
They be bothered by the incorrect assumption that no longer directly the worldwide may be a extra clever place without the sport which comes from a good extra incorrect assumption that it truly is risky and that horses hate racing. in case you analyze jockey/horse harm expenses and motor vehicle crashes you will possibly see a plenty smaller stat for horses. Why? simply by fact all and sundry in the sector is a specialist. I, like very nearly all, hate to be sure injuries, yet that's only area of existence IMO. very stable question.
2016-10-09 01:25:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by higgs 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never looked at it that way before, but you are right only insted of using money we use points,
Bit easier on the hip pocket though.
2007-05-28 23:53:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
How long have you thought about this? Sounds like a long while.
Interesting question, I've never really thought about it like that.
2007-05-29 00:04:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mummabear 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you don't answer like you have to impress Ron Jeremy, the risk is minimal.
2007-05-28 23:50:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your exactly right
2007-05-28 23:50:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
lol, you're a deep thinker!
2007-05-28 23:51:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by pretty smiley 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
What a great analogy!!!!!
2007-05-28 23:49:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
sort of lol
2007-05-28 23:55:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by ausblue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yuppers.....
2007-05-29 00:45:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lefty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋