Why did they spend just half a millon on the 911 commission and spend $60 million investigating Clinton?

Question

One blow v's another.

Is Killing thousands, and somehow hijacking planes with box cutters, out witting NORAD, crashing a "plane" through a no fly zone into the worlds most secure building while leaving no trace of bodies let alone plane, crashing two planes into two of the most recognisable landmarks and bringing them down in almost fee fall time and leaving no evidenence not even a black box, the discovery of molten metal 6 wks after the colaps, plus so many other unanswered questions are not seen as greater travesty as sexual misconduct. Blows me away pardon the pun.

to upallnight:

I did get my facts right they spent between 400 and 500 thousand dollars not 400 million - please you get your facts right before you open your ignorant mouth.

this is the official 9/11 government web site that reports the cost.

www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Exec.htm

Answer 1

What is even more disturbing is that more questions are not being asked about the worst administration the USA has ever seen.

The above is obvious that there is something they are hiding yet everyday Americans don't have the capacity to see what is happeneing before their eyes.

Answer 2

They already knew the answers to 9/11. But for publicity's sake & the general populous, they had to show that they were at least doing SOMETHING on the topic.
In Clinton's case.... What sells in today's society ???
SEX, & Violence !!!!
If they could get proof of wrongdoing by a President,
which party would REAP ALL the benefits ??
Surely not the Dems, since Clinton was a Dem !!!!!!!!!

Frankly, all the Presidents have done scandalous, illicit dealings with members of the opposite sex.... since the beginning of the Presidency office began.
T. Jefferson is reported to have had a black slave mistress, & numerous children by her. Did anyone spend billions of your hard earned money to go investigate all this ??? NO.
It's just a perk of the job. But, the other party wants to rub everyones face in it, like it's something new.

And everyone knows that Bush & C. Rice are going at it.
That's why L.Bush has been staying at a motel & not in the Big W. House for many months now.

Answer 3

Republicans did no longer spend a penny investigating Clinton. Ken Starr replaced into named a undeniable prosecutor, after Janet Reno asked the three decide panel to nominate him in 1994 on the time, there replaced right into a democratic majority in the domicile and Senate. 2. as quickly as appointed, the only man or woman who might desire to do away with Ken Starr as particular prosecutor, replaced into the lawyer common, janet reno. 3. The FBI replaced into the lead employer for the 9/11 analyze, with help from all different government agencies. the fee of that analyze replaced into very nearly one thousand million money. Your puzzling the 9/11 committee, which wasn';t there to look into 9/11, yet to make concepts on the thank you to evade yet another 9/11

Answer 4

Question: Why did they spend just half a millon on the 911 commission and spend $60 million investigating Clinton?

Answer: Because most voters aren't smart enough or moral enough to vote for Libertarians.

Nuff said.

Answer 5

Why? Because a cover up does not need investigation!
When the dirt digging comes, that need lots of investigation.
911 was never investigated, and the government needed no investigators! They knew exactly what happened!
We did not know, and we did not hire investigators, and those who did investigate, scientist like Dr. Jones, lost his job.
The government represented us with a fact,(what they wanted us to believe) and when we questioned it, it become a conspiracy theory!
But as I see, 100 years of brain wash, and public school education still left some brain individually thinking and reasoning.
Good to see, but I have a question: is there enough such brain out there?
One, who has a guts to ask a question, and given reasoning, gives me some hope!

Answer 6

Political.

The 9/11 Commission was for show. It ignored most of the evidence!

As far as Clinton, it was stupid from the start as they knew they did not have the votes to impeach him, and that is exactly what happened, though Sen Lott was cheating on his wife at the time!

That's exactly why Bush has not been impeached. The Democrats certainly have plenty of impeachment evidence, but they would not get the 2/3 vote in a trial.

Bush will be charged as a war criminal anyway! They are waiting in the wings for him to get out of office!

Answer 7

They spent so much money on Clinton because if they did not discredit him in some way there would be no way for Bush to get elected. If they had spent more money on the 9/11 commission some ugly truths would have surfaced and then there would be no way Bush would be able to stay in office. Either way it was all about politics, and who had power.

Answer 8

I think that´s because there are no many things more to investigate to clear what happens on 9-11. Everybody aroud the world knows the truth... who did it... who send the orders... etc.
Otherwise, I think that whas exageretad the amount expended investiganting Clinton... who the worst sin whas try to encover , laying about his pleasant relattions in the oval room.

Answer 9

Because they could not find anything on Clinton and had to spend a whole lot to search some more! Priorities, I guess.

Answer 10

Yea, and why they gon give you life for a murder
Turn around only give you eight months for a burner?

Why is a brother up North better than Jordan That ain't get that break?

Why did bush knock down the towers?

Why did crack have to hit so hard?

Why they let the terminator win the election?

Why Halle have to let a white man pop her to get a Oscar?

Why Denzel have to be crooked before he took it?

Why they ain't give us a cure for aids?

Why?