English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Undoubtedly, this theory, closely allied with the one that states that the tallest candidate is elected President, falls into the category of an urban legend; what's more after searching the Web, I've seen no supporting evidence to verify it. Also, has Burke's Peerage, or anyone else, determined the ancestry of the 2007 candidates? If so, given the "royal" theory, what are the odds of each candidate's election as president?

2007-05-28 21:15:30 · 5 answers · asked by Ellie Evans-Thyme 7 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

No! For a number of reasons. One being most of the populous, electorate do not know the genealogy of Presidential hopefuls. Let alone the ancestry of the English monarchy. Which branch of the monarchy you are talking about. Whether it be the house of Tudor, the house of Stuart, revolution, the restored house of Stuart, glorious revolution, the house of Hanover, the house of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha(renamed the house of Windsor). Or the mythical, manufactured ones I will not even mention. For most it would just be to hard for one to keep track of.
As far as the Royal Theory is concerned. It is just that a theory. That might have some coincidental minuscule evidence to it. But it is just that coincidental. Lets face it! People see a conspiracy in everything. What about all the individuals who were the illegitimate children of people of Royal Blood or the Monarchy as it were. No one would be able to keep track of their descendants. It is a bunch of hogwash. Created by those who need to find external reasons for the peoples lost of control of their own government. Or our way to a more perfect Union of these United States.
A better question would be. How did they become Royals in the first Place. They manufactured and credited the myth that is Royal Blood(Blue Bloods).
Peace!!! Love!!!

2007-06-04 12:22:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Given that it has no basis in fact. I couldn't even hazard to guess. The odds are the same as they currently are without knowledge of each candidates ancestry.

2007-05-30 11:27:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I just read that in a book called The Children of the Matrix, by David Icke, he has a very strong argument

2007-06-04 09:43:36 · answer #3 · answered by Miss 6 7 · 0 0

I nearly choked to death on my Smoked Kipper when I read that !!!
& had to swallow a mouthful of 'Earl Grey' to save my own life
( With my pinkie at attention you understand )

Who thinks up these so called questions ?

2007-06-04 05:31:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No.

2007-06-04 05:14:41 · answer #5 · answered by merrybodner 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers