2007-05-28 19:24:02 · 7 answers · asked by Elizabeth 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
amen melissa the only sensible answer yet of course morals matter
2007-05-28 19:34:58 · update #1
umm, they're running for president, not Pope. i don't think marriage status has ne thing to do w/a person's ability to lead.
2007-05-28 19:30:01 · answer #1 · answered by kelleygaither2000 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion i think that they should only be married once. Just for the fact that if they can't seem to keep a marriage together, then how in the heck are they going to be able to keep a country in order.
OK AVAIL, what in the heck is your problem? No i don't opt to stay with a cheating spouse, its just what ever happened to morals? I know that there are not many ppl left with them but dang. And yes a persons personal life has everything to do with running a country. I mean if they can't keep their personal life together, then how are they ever going to run a country? Now that there is common sense.
This is the one time in life there that you have to forget your own crushed life and use your moral value, that is saying if you even have one. But for some reason after that little spit of fire there, you have no clue what morals are. And i am really sorry for you.
2007-05-29 02:32:20 · answer #2 · answered by Squeakers 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
first of all, what does a person's personal life have to do with running a country.
if they are married more than once, than it shows they fall in line with the majority of Americans who can't seem to keep a marriage together.
would you rather them dump a cheating spouse, or it being front page news all over the world while in office?
Second, if Americans worried less about what isn't their business, a good canidate might actually have a chance.
sounds like Melissa volanteers to stay with a cheating spouse just so she qualifies for an elected office!
2007-05-29 03:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Seems to be 2. Reagan's in the process of being deified .Clinton & Bush get the opposite treatment . Ridiculous question = ridiculous answer.
2007-05-29 02:29:28 · answer #4 · answered by mikeinportc 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I checked the constitution. There is neither a maximum nor as minimum.
2007-05-29 02:31:49 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I cant answer this one because I'm laughing too much!
2007-05-29 02:28:36 · answer #6 · answered by jenna 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, obama isn't married is he?
2007-05-29 02:31:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋