or will they just find something else to complain about...
2007-05-28 17:42:39 · 8 answers · asked by turntable 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
complain
as usual.
2007-05-28 17:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by Adam of the wired 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
This is interesting since nobody really understands the geopolitics of Iran or its major signficance in opening relations other than its believed eminent threat of nuclear proliferation as perpepuated by the media (which intelligent people don't rely very often) The US has acted belligerent to Iran since the 2002 State of the Union Address when Bush lumped Iran with the "Axis of Evil" effectively severring relations with Iran and earning a slap in the face by the Iranian populace who continue to view the US as an imperialist nation. Remember the 1979 Revolution with Khomeini or the 1953 coup in which the US made the Iranians' lives miserable?
Why is Iran so important you ask?
-Iran is blocking peaceful motions in the Middle East
-Its government holds the key to stability and ENDING the IRAQ WAR (most policy experts in the academia will tell you this)
-We have to transcend beyond our animosities to mend our historic ties
-Iran plays a crucial role in ending terrorism (for the Shi'ites anyway)
-Iran's frozen assets IS here
Good job, Ambassador Crocker
2007-05-28 17:50:20 · answer #2 · answered by ibid 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They'll conveniently forget that 27 years covers a few administrations, including Dems.
2007-05-28 23:23:40 · answer #3 · answered by Ret. Sgt. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush refused to talk to Iran one-to-one about their nukes until they stopped enriching uranium. The talks you are talking about are about Iraq security, not nukes. There's no change in the policy of the administration.
2007-05-28 23:20:21 · answer #4 · answered by tttplttttt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they will place a neagative spin on it, and try to upstage things by sending Damascus Nancy and Sell out Hairy to Iran
2007-05-28 23:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see you think of Clinton replaced right into a mendacity piece of regardless of. Bush is extra effectual? Please do certainly no longer thank Bush for something, different than proving what your loved ones can do for you in this u . s . a ..
2016-11-23 13:15:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
huh.......i thought bush was against negotiating with terrorists
2007-05-28 17:46:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
yes ---i do ---finally he took Ron Paul's advise
2007-05-28 17:50:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋