English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

32 answers

ok i luv J'Khary for either sex............i think it's beautiful. Irrizary is a little bit confusing tho. i don't think ur child'll be tease i mean if they had a name like Mary and Bojack i'll see. i mean lighten up people this is the 21st century they're not gonna come out the womb 50 years old so let them have an exciting name.

2007-05-28 17:38:33 · answer #1 · answered by mommy2bsohappy! 3 · 0 1

I like J'Khary better than Irrizary by far! But I think the spelling is really going to throw people off. If you wouldn't have added the pronounciation, I would have never been able to figure that out. Why not JAKARI? I think that would be a lot easier on the kid!

2007-05-28 16:27:32 · answer #2 · answered by NoTurningBackNow 5 · 0 0

I like the first one if you change the spelling so people will know how to pronounce it. Jakari or Jakary or something would be cute and pronounceable. I don't like the second name at all, and I think it would make the kid's life hell.

2007-05-28 16:52:06 · answer #3 · answered by M W 2 · 0 0

If you have to write the pronunciation next to the spelling how do you expect stangers to get it right? The names will always be misspelled and mispronounced. Cute baby names grow up to be embarassing adult names quite often.

2007-05-29 03:12:30 · answer #4 · answered by thearizonapenguin 4 · 0 0

My theory is if you have to provide phonetic spellings of names just so people can pronounce them, it's not a good idea. Your kids will hate their names, and you'll regret it. Think about it- you'll constantly have to correct people when they spell or pronounce the name wrong, and it will happen, A LOT. People ALWAYS spell my sister's name incorrectly, and it's not even difficult like the ones you've chosen. Her name is Caitlin, a name that is not spelled uncommonly. However, no one seems to get it. Can you imagine the number of mistakes with J'Kahry and Irrizary? Best not to chance it.

2007-05-28 16:36:40 · answer #5 · answered by Samantha 4 · 1 1

The first one is okay, not so much the 2nd one. My advise is to keep the spellings of your children's names simple, so that they don't have a hard time spelling it when they start learning to write.

I actually know a girl that is 24 years old, who still can not spell her own middle name. She never learned how! I know...she's a retard!

2007-05-28 20:04:23 · answer #6 · answered by RAE-J 2 · 0 0

They are cute, but don't get frustrated if people often mispronounce them or don't know if it is a boy or a girl by looking at the name.

2007-05-28 16:29:09 · answer #7 · answered by bluefroggy 5 · 0 0

My first reaction is NO. If these are names from your culture, then I would say they are ok. Otherwise, no one will be able to pronounce or spell them, or even know if they are for a boy or girl.

2007-05-28 17:03:47 · answer #8 · answered by Andrea N 2 · 1 0

They're not bad names, just the poor kid will have everyone calling him/her anything but their name. Most people won't be able to pronounce them correctly. Being unique is nice, but not when no one knows how to say it.

2007-05-28 16:31:40 · answer #9 · answered by wldntulike_2know 4 · 1 0

The first isn't that bad but you have to think of the child and the fact that they have to learn to spell it and people miss pronouncing it.

2007-05-28 16:35:43 · answer #10 · answered by Tracy Lynn 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers