Yes.
The Red Sox had a record 17-run inning back in 1953. Simply doing the math (minimum 20 batters) tells us that at least two men (well, slots in the batting order) came up three times; I vaguely recall that, actually, three men got a third plate appearance. Alas, no box score readily available; the game was on 18-June-1953 against Detroit, Boston (unsurprisingly) winning 23-3 at Fenway.
More recently, but still with the Red Sox, the Marlins got pummelled (again, at Fenway) on 27-June-2003, with the Sox posting 14 runs in the bottom of the first (ten scored before the first out was made, a record). Leadoff hitter Johnny Damon came up three times -- doubled (scored), then tripled (scored, the record 10th run), and finally singled. This was the 19th and last plate appearance of the inning, as Nixon scored but Mueller was thrown out at home. Box: http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/2003/B06270BOS2003.htm
Damon had two more hits but did not homer to complete the cycle.
-----
PS. Here's that steamrolling of Houston by Cincinnati at home, 03-August-1989, 14 runs in the first inning. Duncan and Quinones got up three times. Check out poor Bob Forsch's pitching line -- an extreme case of "taking one for the team". Box: http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/1989/B08030CIN1989.htm
2007-05-28 14:44:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't remember when, excep tthat it has been sometime in the last 20 years, but the Reds (I'm pretty certain when Eric Davis played there) once had an inning in which they batted around twice and then some.
Yes.
2007-05-28 14:45:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope, in no way. that could desire to be robust embarassing if that have been to take place. because of the fact of this there could be 19 at bats and sixteen ppl attain and u bypass 0-3. sucks. yea 3 AB in one inning is unusual sufficient. I even have only seen that once in the previous.
2016-12-30 04:46:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋