Hillary, I really want to see what Clinton would do as The First Husband..
2007-05-28 13:39:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Stugots 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, what I use for reference is the first Democratic debate that took place in April. A lot of people were expecting a stellar showing by Obama, but that's not what they got. Obama was obviously nervous and couldn't get his feet under him for about the first third of the debate. He seemed a bit unprepared and he gave a terrible answer to the question of what he would do if the country were attacked on our own soil again. Hillary had her ducks all in a row, and strong ducks they were. Debates are where inexperience can hurt a candidate and hurt them bad. She's done this a few times, and it's as natural as breathing to her. At least in the first debate, she ended up looking and sounding extremely Presidential, with solid answers and no mincing words, while Obama looked like pretty good VP material.
I expect he will come into further debates a great deal more prepared and coached and he'll make a better showing. But he's going to have a very hard time besting Sen. Clinton no matter how prepared he is coming in. He's getting a lot of criticism for being way too general when asked about issues like Iraq, immigration, and health care - in opposition to Hillary, who has detailed plans mapped out and ready to fly. If he's going to give her a run for her money, he's got to do better in future debates.
2007-05-28 16:25:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obama is one of the best speakers that I've heard in the past few weeks. Hillary's kind of like nails on a chalkboard. I truly believe Obama wants to make a difference in the lives of American's. Hillary just has her own agenda. We voted for George because we were tired of the Clinton's in the White House. We need to remember that. I would vote for Obama. Watch the Democrats debate on CNN on June 3 and the Republican debate on that same station on June 5, then decide for yourselves.
2007-05-28 21:51:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Campaigning is a game of responding to a basic list of popular concerns. Obama does this well. Hillary on the other hand is far more enlightened and involved in the deep rooted problems of America and the world. I'm afraid Obama would be caught with his pants down in a serious debate.
2007-05-28 13:56:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would love to see Hillary as president and Obama as vice president. I think he has a lot of good things to say but needs a little more experience. They both are good at debate but Hillary knows how the system works from the inside.
2007-05-28 14:02:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by J 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Obama is Council on Foreign Relations bought and paid
for, as are almost all other candidates on both sides,
and who have been, including their cabinets going back
to Wilson.
The Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bilderberg Group,
Bohemian Grove, Skull & Bones of BOTH parties use
corporate news to tell lies to your children. The
Fourth Branch of the govt (lame-stream media) have
spent a century spinning away from their crimes!
Trilateral Commission, CFR, Bilderberg Group, Bohemian
Grove, Skull & Bones, Project for the New American
Century
Teachers and Professors blind you to the true History
of America and how it was retold by the winners:
Rockefeller/JP
Morgan/Rothchilds/Dupont/Bush
(Google: federal reserve jekyll island, prescott
thyssen, ibm nazi)
These evil puppet masters do the
bidding of their corporate paymasters who are so
afraid of the average American realizing they have
been stealing not only our FREEDOM but our hope of
providing a better life not only for our children but
also for mankind as a whole. These are the real
terrorists that are trying to take away our freedom
and democracy!
Ask your grandfather how hard work used
to be enough for anyone to live the American dream.
(Americans work longer hours and are more productive
yet wages do not increase to match the rapidly
increasing cost of food, energy, housing) Soon this
could become only a dream that will go from the
average American to the elites and their families
while the population is enslaved by the murdering
despicable thieves of liberty and the people's money:
2007-05-28 14:44:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by RON PAUL for President 2008 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Sounds like you're taking a lot for granted, as if the only two candidates are H & O. I dont think either is electable, however, I think H would clean his clock in a debate. She has been in the political arena for too many years, and O is running for the simple reason that somebody, whom he trusts it seems, has told him he's the next savior of the democrat party, a bit of advice that in my opinion is completely ludricous.
2007-05-28 13:43:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Job1000 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Obama is more likeable and can speak better. His face isn't as scary as Hillarys. He doesn't change his opinion on the war in Iraq every two minutes.
2007-05-28 14:18:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Mitt Romney
2007-05-28 14:34:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sleeck 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
This would be a nightmare for me. It would definitely be picking the lesser of two evils. I guess Obama only because I dislike Hillary more than him.
2007-05-28 15:06:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Cinner 7
·
0⤊
3⤋