These babies are viable and there are many who would give them a good home. I know many who would welcome even those babies suffering extreme forms of birth defects into their lives.
I can't think of even one valid reason for allowing partial birth abortions. Even if the mother's life is in danger, the baby is normally viable and doesn't need to be killed! Surely, C-Sections or, induced labor could be used in order to spare the child's its life.
Agreed? Aren't they just wrong?
2007-05-28
12:24:52
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
If a mother has been irresponsible enough to let her pregnancy go that long, I think she has lost the right to have a say so and should have some consideration for the life of her baby! Killing a viable baby for convenience sake is murder!!
2007-05-28
12:31:19 ·
update #1
Any options used to kill viable babies should be followed up by murder charges!
2007-05-28
12:33:13 ·
update #2
There's lots of proof that they have been performed. This is one of many.
http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/
2007-05-28
12:39:07 ·
update #3
Many adoptive parents would be willing to foot the medical bills. It would not be difficult to arrange, as it is done all the time.
2007-05-28
12:48:06 ·
update #4
thank you, dylan.
2007-05-28
13:18:41 ·
update #5
I dont believe in it unless there are certain circumstances like the baby being deformed. But I believe you should give birth and give it up for adoption
2007-05-28 18:01:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your normal person would think so, but the immoral left seem to think it's a good way to get "rid" of their own choice to have sex without using protection. How many cases are there when the woman's life is in danger? Very few. The Dems just use that as a crutch. When we win in 08 all of the abortion clinics and abortion on demand vans will be destroyed. How immoral and disgusting are these people? All abortion is murder. Period.
2007-05-28 12:52:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by SillierKimmy! 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
None persons might opt to be in Obamas footwear precise now. i do no longer understand approximately coronary heart, yet whilst the guy has any backbone he would desire to easily have a conflict with people who have been given him elected. the extreme left-wing who have been especially to blame for investment his attempt are squeamish approximately killing radical extremists (we are no longer allowed to call them terrorists) yet ought to care much less approximately butchering residing human fetuses. Time will tell... TO via #2: that's staggering which you're an actual contributor here. The responses that I even have considered from you get away good judgment and basic sturdy sense. according to hazard you're a sort of persons who has greater advantageous than one account call and votes frequently?
2016-11-05 21:09:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by hinch 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Abortion is murder period. I don't care if a "mother" is in her third term or has been pregnant 1 week, once an egg is fertilized life begins. But partial births are heinous, I don't think people know how they're done... (it's just a drawing but still pretty disgusting) http://www.abortiontv.com/images/PartialBirthProcedure.JPG .
2007-05-28 12:36:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Murder is a legal term But now that the law has changed, it is indeed applicable to that particular procedure.
And last I checked, it's NOT the WOMAN'S body that is ripped apart or scalded with chemicals!
2007-05-28 12:34:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Partial birth abortions are not only murder but ranks up there with satanic.
2007-05-28 13:39:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by puddog57 4
·
6⤊
0⤋
You are simply a simple minded person that is being taken advantage of for political reasons. I feel sorry for you, you will end up causing the death of thousands of loved and living children.
Lets say you spend 100 thousand dollars delivering and caring for a deformed child after it is born. And suppose you spend another million raising the poor child. And then someone must take over for you spending another million or two.
At the same time thousands of other children are dying, simply for a lack of support. In fact statistics show that billions of children will die over the lifetime of the single child you "save" from abortion and spend millions of dollars to force it to suffer through life.
In your book it is murder to kill the fetus, in my book you are the murderer of the millions of kids that die due to your selfish political reasoning.
It is you that is wrong, you are the one killing kids. And it is you that puts more emphasis on the life of a fetus than upon the life of a child.
You are simply a small minded person, used by a political machine. You don't care about life, you let people murder children and expect a pat on the back. Well you won't get it from any thinking human.
2007-05-28 16:46:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Give me Liberty 5
·
0⤊
6⤋
You are absolutely right. And, the argument that you cannot tell a woman what to do with her body is flacid. If I have a highly contagious fatal disease I would think that the government would quarantine my whole body and no one would complain.
2007-05-28 12:29:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Isn't it also wrong to mandate what a woman does with her body?
Edit: Then you better be for nationalized health care. That way you can insure the woman a healthy pregnancy and the infant's continued life. Infant mortality is on the rise in this country due to lack of access to health care. That's a lot sicker than partial-birth abortions.
2007-05-28 12:27:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
7⤋
Yes you are so very right. Murder is murder is murder !!!!!!
2007-05-28 13:34:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sweet Tea & Lemons 6
·
3⤊
0⤋