English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What can we do to stop it!?
It makes me cry when i really think about poor innocent animals being practicly tortured for MAKEUP and stuff....Test it on yourselves...

2007-05-28 07:34:01 · 28 answers · asked by CandyApple<333 3 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

28 answers

I think we should use prisoners instead of animals. Animals are innocent.

2007-05-28 07:37:17 · answer #1 · answered by FireBug 5 · 3 1

i think of it is cruel. And it extremely is not "organic". there is no longer something organic approximately dropping a mouse (that's now and returned "drugged" by way of fact the proprietors say) right into a pitcher field devoid of get away. The snake knows of the enclosure interior and out jointly as the mouse has no thought what's occurring. The mouse does not even have of undertaking. this does not ensue in nature. Very stressful and interior the top painful for the mouse. even if like abdul s reported it remains much less painful than a rat demise from rat poison. : stay animals can pass on illnesses to the animal it is eating it. some stay prey may additionally injure the owner's puppy... i've got seen some terrible wounds throughout a snake that have been inflicted with the help of the rat it became meant to consume. stay bugs it gets slightly complicated. they're neccasary for some pets and could't be fed lifeless. i think of it relies upon... bugs tend to die promptly finding on the animal it is eating it. it extremely is nonetheless no longer high-quality yet I see it slightly extra humane than a extra clever rodent or chicken dealing with a lot of stress and listening to them scream in discomfort while they're caught (have seen some youtube movies). even if i don't comprehend what the bugs flow via so... maximum animals *do no longer* choose stay meat of their weight loss plan. A snake, etc can stay high-quality on already lifeless animals. If a snake won't consume a frozen rat, they often will in case you warmth it up first. maximum snakes that don't consume lifeless prey are wild caught. extra functional to assist captive bred animals. I agree that many slaughterhouses are poor. i don't comprehend the placement right here in Australia approximately how animals are positioned down yet i'm attempting to ascertain and that i does not consume knowingly consume an animal that comes from a place the place they have been cruely taken care of and slaughtered. yet sure I consume meat. no longer stay however. :P i could on no account use trojan horse spray on an insect or spider, i think of it extremely is thoroughly unneccasary and unfair in basic terms by way of fact it happens to be in a house. lots less difficult and happier to place them outdoors. :) I desire extra people could save on with suite.

2016-10-06 04:54:23 · answer #2 · answered by duktig 4 · 0 0

I think animal abuse is wrong. One thing you can do is go onto PETA.com and they have a list of company's who do test on animals and you can stop using there products. Tell friends and anybody you know are see and tell them to stop using those products so they don't get much business. You could also start a petition or something like that and help influence others to take action too. Even doing a little helps a lot.

2007-05-28 07:41:53 · answer #3 · answered by RiotTabGrrrl 2 · 0 1

I guess they do have to test the makeup and such on someone to make sure it's safe for the rest of us.
The first time I see an animal, of any kind, going into a store to buy makeup I might start to agreeing to testing it on animals. Until then, people use it, test it on people.

2007-05-28 08:07:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Very wrong.
Not only do animals suffer and die needlessly, the results are useless. Animals don't react the same to drugs and chemicals as humans. Examples:
The anti-rheumatic drug Opren killed 76 people and caused serious illness to 3,500 others, despite having been declared safe after seven years of animal research.
Penicillin is deadly to guinea pigs but cures many human infections. If Penicillin had been initially tested only on guinea pigs, it might have been discarded and the world would have been deprived of the single most important medical treatment ever invented.
Crixivan, the most potent HIV drug to date, was discarded for four years because it killed all of the dogs it was tested on.

2007-05-28 07:40:54 · answer #5 · answered by anonymous 6 · 0 1

I think animal testing is very wrong, inhumane, and thoughtless. Animals are very different from humans anyway, so what's the point? You certainly can get involved...try Peta2-you can join the street team, it's very fun and you can even earn points for goods by helping animals. Check out the Animal Protection Institutes webpage, or Care2. You can get involved in a lot of petition signings there. (The Petition site) Animals NEED your voice. Please join us and help! Thank you for asking that VERY inportant question.

2007-05-28 07:39:55 · answer #6 · answered by Animal Rights Girl 2 · 0 1

Animal testing is definately wrong! It is so sad when animals are abused! I agree with the petition idea!

2007-05-28 07:39:18 · answer #7 · answered by sweetart993 3 · 0 0

i hate it to. I think that just because the animals can't say no, means it's ok. it's very sad and I buy only products that do animal free testing.

2007-05-28 07:37:34 · answer #8 · answered by Jellybean 4 · 1 0

I agree completely with U!but what else shall we do?It' unavoidable,as we must practice on animals for human health,individually we may help animals by making shelters for them or being kind to them!good luck!

2007-05-28 07:44:03 · answer #9 · answered by condy 3 · 0 1

Oh get over it. Everybody has to have a "cause". Whatever. Maybe you forgot we're in WW3. A bunny getting a little lipstick compared to a million people getting killed because thier in the wrong part of the city is a bigger problem, grow up.

2007-05-28 07:38:10 · answer #10 · answered by Ryan P 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers