My guess is that he'll get a year like Pacman.
2007-05-28 06:33:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
i hope they just drop the whole thing because all you ever hear about nowadays is how players are breaking the law and the game of football suffers from it i think if they dont break the nfl code of conduct then they should still be allowed to play until given a punishment by the law
2007-05-28 06:46:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This will be an interesting story to follow. Michael Vick, while guilty of doing some idiotic things, does not have a comparable criminal history to that of Pacman or Chris Henry.
If sufficient evidence is brought against Vick to take him to trial, then he may have a lot more to worry about than an NFL suspension. Dog fighting is a felony and Vick might spend some time behind bars. He would probably be incarcerated during the off-season like Jamal Lewis.
Vick has a history of being an idiot but not being a criminal. As a result I would be surprised if he was suspended for longer than 4 games. If he messes up again after that then he could be in a world of hurt.
2007-05-28 18:08:46 · answer #2 · answered by The Pain is Un-Bearable 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None. He is a star player and they will not find enough evidence to convict him. Pacman and Chris Henry have been getting in trouble for years. Vick has only had a few incidents. Remember the water bottle. It mysteriously disappeared. I bet the NFL didn't even drug test him right after that.
2007-05-28 06:40:51 · answer #3 · answered by Sean C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whether he's accountable or no longer won't exchange the certainty that he's an overvalued quarterback. He ranked twenty 2nd with a seventy 5.7% passer score, threw for below 154 yards according to pastime on ordinary, threw 13 interceptions, and his group complete 7-9 and third interior the NFC South. Does that sound like it particularly is properly worth $17.7 million to you? upload that to the certainty that he flipped off followers, have been given caught with bong water at an airport, and is now below federal study for prepared canines fights, and it particularly is fantastically problematical to care what finally ends up occurring to the loser.
2016-11-05 21:17:28 · answer #4 · answered by canevazzi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i think the nfl is the least of vicks worries right now...if Va can prove that he ran the dog fighting ring hes going up for felonies, min of a year for each one,...but then after that i think he should get a life ban for being an idiot(and a horrible qb)
2007-05-28 06:38:57 · answer #5 · answered by smokinantz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might not get any punishment at all. It all depends on the proof, or lack there of. I will say one thing, I would not want to be on the bad side of Roger “The Hammer” Goodell. I love this new commissioner.
2007-05-28 08:19:15 · answer #6 · answered by soccermaniac2971 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might not get any punishment at all. It all depends on the proof, or lack there of. I will say one thing, I would not want to be on the bad side of Roger “The Hammer” Goodell. I love this new commissioner.
2007-05-28 07:10:38 · answer #7 · answered by None Profound 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
since this time they found him fighting dogs, i dont think the NFL is going to do anything
2007-05-28 06:37:09 · answer #8 · answered by bryan k 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he is con'VICK'ted, than he will get half a year to a year. If he isnt, than nothing.
2007-05-28 08:14:42 · answer #9 · answered by Arctica 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think they should force him to win once in a while
2007-05-28 06:59:35 · answer #10 · answered by troisième oeil ouvert 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋