3.14
2007-05-28 06:25:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are different derivations of pie, including apple, cherry, and the classical meat variants. All of these pies, when derived carefully lead to an accurate numerical solution of deliciousness.
Theorem: Pie is delicious
Proof:
|| 1.Peel and core the apples.
|| 2.Slice the apples and fill the prepared shell.
|| 3.In a separate bowl, mix together the sugar and nutmeg.
:. Sprinkle the sugar mixture on top of the apples in the shell.
-=->Using your fingers, sprinkle a little bit of water around the edge of the crust. This will help the top crust adhere to the bottom crust.
.
Fold the top crust in half and carefully lay it on top of the apples. Fold it over to meet the opposite edge of the pie plate.
-=->
Fold the edge of the top crust under the bottom crust and crimp the edges. Cut four slits for vents.
Bake at 450 degrees Fahrenheit for 15 minutes and then turn the oven down to 325 degrees for 35 more minutes
QED
2007-05-28 06:46:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by smthbrothrj 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have an appreciation for what real math is. The further you delve, the more you start to appreciate what can only be described as the simple complexities for mathematics. However, in high school, the level most people study maths to, it is not about the nature of maths. It is about the complicated equations and manipulation of formulas. It's true that what you see in school isn't anything like professional mathematics. But the stuff in school is all most see.
2016-04-01 01:04:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pi evolved from the Egyptian rope stretchers (the first surveyors) get a copy of this book "the history of Pi". I have that and read it many years ago. you'll find that like others, there were those burned at the stake because the math proof did not agree with the dogma of the day. (chk those that kill thier wives and children. How sad a sick mind blinded can be)the math history is a interesting read. it also covers Euler and others...may you live in interesting times.
2007-06-01 14:58:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pi = C/D
where C is the circumference of a circle, and D is the diameter.
C = 2PiR
D = 2R
2*Pi*R/2*R = Pi
Archimedes (3rd century BC) made the first real scientific effort to calculate pi using polygons -- he calculated pi to about 3.14. A value equivalent to 3.1416 for pi dates from before AD 200.
Over the years, we've come closer to calculating the value of pi. The German mathematician Ludolph Van Ceulen (1540-1610) spent his entire life calculating pi to 35 places. Lately, computers have carried pi to more than 100,000,000 decimal places.
2007-05-28 06:29:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by cjdevlin 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think you are asking the equation to solve for pi, so here is by far the esiest way to come up with it (there are many methods to approximate it that are much more difficult and have varying accuracy, this method however is fool-proof)
pi = circumference of a circle / diameter of the same circle
2007-05-28 06:29:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are a large number of formulas for the value of Pi. They are either inefficient or incomprehensible! Here, in Wikipedia, is a simple series that converges slowly!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi#Calculating_.CF.80
2007-05-28 06:28:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Charley M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What can ruin a pie is the crust. The crust has to be just right.
The taste of a great pie is simple transcendental and you
keep coming back for more. There are many recipes for pie.
It depends on your taste.
2007-05-28 07:26:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by knashha 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Fibonacci series theory is involved in solving for pi. Its the phi function.
2007-05-28 06:33:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was found that when the circumference of a circle is divided by its diameter always a constant quantity appears named as pi
2007-05-31 21:31:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by pretender 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are a lot:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi
2007-05-28 06:28:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋