If you are panty remover(a yahoo member)please do not answer my question.
2007-05-28 04:29:14 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
No! He is/was a very talented person. Probably one of the greatest talents of his time. You can admire a persons talent without admiring the way they manage their personal lives.
2007-05-28 04:38:07 · answer #1 · answered by mischiefmaker_kc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. His music has been the background for so many memories the world over. And the dancing, oh boy is it fantastic to watch. I know he's not someone that I could ever be friends with but that's probably true of so many artists. His art is one thing and what came before the nightmare is fair game.
I can't imagine that he'll ever be able to put out anything new like the old stuff and, frankly, I don't think that it would interest me with what I know now.
As previously stated, what came before is fair game.
2007-05-28 14:42:53 · answer #2 · answered by CUrias 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has done some great work in the past, though having been a victim of child abuse, I find it hard to support a performer who at the very least has an issue with pedophilia.
2007-05-28 11:36:26 · answer #3 · answered by Beach Saint 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It's not wrong. You need to think for yourself. He was accused and found not guilty of the crime. I still think he is the most talented singer. I still like some of his music. No. It's not wrong.
2007-05-28 11:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why wud it be wrong hes got some good music and it dont matter if he is whatever it has nothing to do with his music , if you like it you like it and if anyone says your wrong for it f them
2007-05-28 11:34:27 · answer #5 · answered by stevie g 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stupid question
2007-05-28 11:33:43 · answer #6 · answered by Hector B 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋