2007-05-28 03:26:48 · 8 answers · asked by johnnyBgood 4 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
No....we are creations of matter. Once we move through time, we take that matter and move it. I just don't think that we can exist as a single being in various stages of time if the matter is not duplicated. It doesn't hold up to any theory concerning the existence of matter.
2007-05-28 03:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by DinahLynne 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes.
time is shown as a change in the location of matter. a planet can move from one place to another, or molecules in a chemical compound can change to be in a different compound after a chemical reaction. all these follow certain rules and these rules include time.
you can stop time if you know the true nature of time and you can prevent matter from moving.
reverse time is reversing the rules of the equation. reversing gravity so planets move in the opposite direction, and reversing chemistry so reaction go the other way.
then everything will be going backwards.
it is theoretically possible. and physicists have been playing with their expensive toys trying to work out what the theory is and have come up with some good ideas, but no theory.
if you want to learn the theory, i see three options to going about it
1. stop what your doing. stop everything. only read physics books and enough else to keep you alive. in three years or so you will be able to talk to stephen hawkings and in 4-5 years can help him and others to solve the problem
2. stop what your doing. make as much money as you possibly can and divide it between investment and research into time travel. if you pay for people to work out the theory, then it is yours and yours alone.
3. stop what your doing. only read biology and medical books. it will take more than 100 years to discover time travel, and first you will have to work out how to live for more than 120 years, then do steps 1 or 2
2007-05-28 11:34:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, logical? No, of course not. As a theory? Well, just about anything is theoretical. Trust me, I would love Star Trek and The Time Tunnel to be true...try this logic: backward time travel hasn't ever and WILL never come to be, and we know this because no one from the future has come back and stopped 9/11 from happening...and all of that "it will disrupt the time line" is utter cop out nonsense. If someone could travel back in time, they would have prevent such tragedies as that, Pearl Harbor, Lincoln's and Kennedy's assassinations, and of course the Bush elections.
2007-05-28 10:39:00 · answer #3 · answered by Iamstitch2U 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Google "grandfather paradox". This addresses the main logical objection to backwards time travel. Time travel is only logically impossible, though, if the universe has only one timeline. Google "Many Worlds Interpretation" for a possible out.
2007-05-28 11:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you can logically explain some sort of "bubble" (containing the traveler) that is not effected by the time travel i.e.; outside of the time/space continuum.
.
2007-05-28 12:34:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My theory on this subject is: we would end up right where we started, in our mother's womb. Lord, high school again??
2007-05-28 10:35:29 · answer #6 · answered by dtwladyhawk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course if you can develop sth. which can stop time for u within the machine and let the time of the universe to move.
2007-06-01 04:21:51 · answer #7 · answered by pretender 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not, there is only NOW.
2007-05-31 12:50:41 · answer #8 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋