Yeah, and killing those 655,000 Iraqis, 90% of whom had nothing to do with Saddam's regime and were just unlucky enough to be caught in the crossfire of war, just created another 100,000 or more insurgents who are now sympathetic to fundamentalist Islamic causes from the surviving sons, husbands and fathers who were enraged by their pointless losses.
You see, it would be one thing if these people who had lost a family member had some reason to think that their loss was suffered in exchange for something worthwhile. But no, their lives over there aren't getting any better. Day after day they suffer from not even having basic water and electrical facilities. Another day brings only more killing of innocent people, some of whom are more of their friends or family members, with no end in sight.
And then they also see evidence of acts of American brutality, such as the human butt pyramids, torture and rape of their fellow Iraqis. And in their anguish and bitterness over their loss, many of the survivors who were formerly neutral to the Americans now turn to join the ranks of the insurgents because correctly or not, they perceive the Americans as oppressors who caused their loved ones to die.
There are now more terrorist insurgents or sympathizers in the Middle East because of what we have done in Iraq than there ever were before. And it isn't going to get any better over there.
You rather dimwitted conservatives just can't wrap your minds around the concept. You just can't understand why we still haven't eliminated the insurgent problem even though we've killed a great number of them. You see, killing more Iraqis only replenishes the reservoir of bitterness and misery from which insurgent extremists are drawn. And the more we kill, the more it will seem like there's just a bottomless well of insurgents willing to kill American forces.
So yeah, great job you conservatives have done over there. Just wonderful.
Btw, 70% of the country agrees with me. And that statistic is only going to get worse for you, until it reaches the point that people just laugh at you for being a nutjob to be pitied for his pathetically lunatic views.
2007-05-28 02:26:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah but how many years has it taken to kill a mere 655,000 - it'd be much simpler if the US were systematicly using gas chambers, you could have processed several million Iraqi's by now by the most conservative of estimates.
How many dead Iraqis would you need to consider it a victory though?
2007-05-28 04:17:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
as you can see by the answer you have received demo/libs,are idiots,of those 655,000 iraqis killed the U.S. military maybe responsible for at most 5,000 the rest are being killed by muslims allies of the democrats/liberals which they must defend,and in doing so must attack the U.S. military and accuse our troops of all iraqi deaths,if they allow the focus of the American public,and that of the world to see the true murders of the iraqi people,(muslim terrorist),allies of the democrats/liberals they would by destroyed in the American political system,and cease to exist!
2007-05-28 02:15:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by truckman 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because we is thinkin that we're tired of war, and that 655,000 dead Iraqis don't make the situation any better, mon.
2007-05-28 02:00:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gordon Freeman 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Liberals are heavily invested in the defeat of America. They hope that America is defeated, so they can use that to install a neo-socialist state. If you look at history, it is just about the same tactics that the Communists used in World War One, when they seized control of Russia.
2007-05-28 02:12:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by John 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
If the goal is maximizing death they you're right, we are doing a good job.
If the goal is stabilizing the region, it's a lot worse than it was four years ago.
2007-05-28 02:21:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ash 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
War is not a solution for anything. If you believe that violence can resolve differences, you obviously lack intelligence.
2007-05-28 03:42:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by SKYDOG 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You just give a nuke to these people. Seriosly, they shouldn't be allowed to handle a table knife without being shackled.
2007-05-28 02:13:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Regal 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look up the definition of Liberal and you will have your answer.
2007-05-28 02:01:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by April Jewell 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
163:1 ratio? Not bad.
2007-05-28 02:03:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by flushles 3
·
1⤊
3⤋