A singularity. It is so very very dense there is no space inside it, it occupies no space (in our universe)...Can you imagine that? Don't you think they should have named it a black full instead?
2007-05-28 01:43:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yahoo! 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
nicely, that's not that they are interior one yet another, yet that they combine to make a larger one. because of the character of a black hollow we can't be in one, it quite is nicely the place a great great huge call supernovas, and the middle of the huge call is what makes the black hollow, the middle of the huge call is so tightly compacted that a teaspoon of the fabric could weigh as plenty because of the fact the Earth. This makes for quite intense gravity, and, there are billions of black holes interior the Universe, so i'm assuming that query 2 is that we've black holes in our Galaxy, that's real, they suspect there's a huge one interior the middle of the Milky way,a nd maximum black holes do stay interior the centers of all galaxies. that's to assert we at the instant are not in a black hollow, because of the fact not plenty is common approximately them, because of the fact the closest one to us is 30,000 gentle years away, they have some information yet do not understand each and every of the solutions. even with the shown fact that, i think of if we've been in one it could be tearing the sunlight aside, so we'd have the flexibility to be certain the gasoline flow from the black hollow pulling off the layers of gasoline from the sunlight. yet one greater reason is that there at the instant are not too many double stars, which may well be close sufficient to the two supernova on the comparable time to make 2 black holes interior each and every others draw close, now that's not to assert that 2 colliding Galaxies could at last finally end up with their black holes nearing one yet another, however the gap between stars is in basic terms too great for this to take place.
2016-12-30 03:44:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry to tell you man but the milky way is a galaxy, in fact the galaxy that we live in. A black hole is created by the death of a large star. When a star starts to run out of energy it begins shedding its outer layers until in final implodes. Im sure you have heard of a super nova. When the star runs out of energy and sheds its last later is a huge explosion, it then collapses on itsself and becomes so dense that it warps the space around it. This creates extreme gravity that even traps light. Other stars and planets and therefore any other object that is within is gravity are also consumed making the black hole larger. Some black holes even consume entire galaxies and are created by the death of far away galaxies. So black holes are made out of the same material that a star is made out of because in fact they used to be large stars.
Justin
2007-05-28 01:13:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean a black hole having a mass of the Milky way,which is about 1x 10^42 kilograms .
If that is the case ;It would have a radius equal to
Schwartzchild Radius =Rs. This radius is calculated as follows; Rs=G x M /C^2 where G in Newton's constant,M is mass of the milky way and C is the speed of light.
This black hole radius would be=7.42x10^14meters.
It would have a massive density equal to = Mass of black hole / volume of black hole.
Black hole density with the mass of our galaxy is 5.84 x10^-4 kilograms per meter cube. So as per your question ,this black hole contains a mass of extremely low density.As low or even lower than the density of air.
So to say that black hole have high densities because they are massive Would be stretching it a bit.
2007-05-28 04:07:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by goring 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The laws of relativity makes the answer to this question rather interesting, as to whether the object actually enters the inside of a black hole is dependent upon whose reference frame you are considering.
We begin the answer by stating several properties pertinent to black holes: An object is defined to have entered a black hole upon reaching its "event horizon", the point at which the escape velocity of the ambient gravitational field exceeds that of light, and any information relayed by the object can no longer have any effect upon the outlying universe. Also, given that upon entering the black hole, the falling object can no longer relay any information about itself to the universe, the usual laws of physics governing its properties, aside from the conservation of mass, charge, and spin, no longer apply.
We now note the problems that arise when we consider the two possible reference frames for the falling object. From the reference frame of an observer standing outside the event horizon of a black hole, an object influenced by the black hole's gravitational field takes an infinite amount of time to cross the event horizon; effectively the object never actually eneters the black hole. However, from the reference frame of the observer traveling along with the falling object towards the singularity of the black hole, a finite amount of time elapses before the event horizon is reached. Hence, we are left with the conundrum: did the object actually reach the inside of the black hole? As we are observers located in the region outside of a black hole, from our perspective, no matter has ever entered a black hole's event horizon, for an infinite amount of time would be required for this to happen. Thus, as far as we are concerned, there is nothing inside black holes.
2007-05-28 02:07:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by riemannsurface2 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Massive, crushing gravity and little else. When matter turns into (or falls into) a black hole, only 3 things get preserved: Mass, spin and charge. Other than that, there's nothing that can be perceived or measured inside a black hole. All other characteristics of the original matter are lost forever.
2007-05-28 01:21:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nature Boy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Falling Into a Black Hole
In which we fall into a black hole on a real free fall orbit. All distortions of images are real, both general relativistic from the gravitational bending of light, and special relativistic from the near light speed orbit.
The black hole belongs to a quadruple stellar system, a binary binary. The system is fictional, but plausible.
After you are done dying at the central singularity of the black hole, feel free to explore more about the Schwarzschild geometry, about wormholes, about the collapse of a black hole, and about Hawking radiation.
2007-05-28 01:08:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by AVIAN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to Einstien, who later believed in Black Holes, there is a great force of gravity and black hole further has divisions, most impotant of which is a WORMHOLE, which is connected to another universe.
2007-05-28 01:10:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by MOST INTELLIGENT BOY 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a black hole could exist it would contain nothing but intense gravity.
There are many good reason why a black hole cannot exist even though it is a logical [superficially ] theoretical entity.
2007-05-28 02:00:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Billy Butthead 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
i prefer that black holes are entrances or exits to something out there..maybe it's a road for a new beginning of life..we don't know what's out there..
2007-05-28 03:47:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋