Did the Pop meet with the parents of any of the other thousand missing children in the world. I guess he is going to say a special prayer for these people that will hopefully keep them out of hell, because it is waiting. God Bless.
2007-05-28 01:08:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bethy4 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read Gerrys a so called caring dads blog of his day yesterday and tell me he is not bloody hiding something. The focus is all wrong and before Team Mccann jump down my throat saying he mentions Maddy - It is a always as a bloody AFTERTHOUGHT -As if someone prods Gerry and says you had better put a few words about Maddy in there or else the money to our coffers may dry up - " oops says Gerry, I dont want to be in the red and in dispair like when I was a student and over my overdraft - thats the same way i feel about my missing daughter" Now Team Mccann, I beg of you to tell me that comparing your missing daughter to being overdrawn is a CARING DAD, WITH NOTHING TO HIDE.
Come on and bring it on. I can list all the stupid inaccurate lies they have said and now they dont have early news reports on thier site and only from 8th May as what they said early days is not what they say now.
Latest Update - Gerry's Blog/Diary
27 May 2007
DAY 24
Strange day after all the activity during the week. Kate and I started off with an early morning run to the the top of the nearby cliffs. Sean and Amelie were back in kids club and went swimming again. The rest of us attended mass which was very emotional as a priest from RAF Lossiemouth was visiting and further prayers were said for Madeleine. Father Zee-Manuel has also rigged up a powerpoint display projecting a large photograph of Madeleine on to the wall, which he is very proud of and reminds us of the beautiful little girl we are missing so terribly.
There have been some requests for more information ‘about Madeleine’ and this section will be updated very soon. We will also be releasing a very short video of Madeleine taken at the Airport on the day we left for Portugal, Saturday 28 April. Sean and Amelie went to the beach this afternoon with mummy, auntie Trisha and Anne but daddy stayed in the apartment catching up on campaign e-mails, making calls and liaising with Clarence our press officer. The resort is much busier again as it is half-term and there are definitely less journalists here. Many of them have been here since the beginning and are making this journey with us.
The couple of Sunday articles we read did not cover much of what we talked about and seemed to get some of the other stuff wrong! We stated that Sean and Amelie are sleeping in our room (in separate cots) because of other family staying with us and that we were trying to treat them as normal and not be overprotective. This came out that we were so protective we have to have them sleeping in our bed! These inaccuracies are not important in our search for Madeleine and the next phase is being planned currently.
It looks like our planned trips to other European cities will start off in Rome after we learned today that the Pope has been following Madeleine’s abduction closely. There is a reasonable chance we may get a chance to meet the Pontiff and that he will pray for Madeleine. Such a visit would generate huge publicity regarding the family campaign to find Madeleine and will also give Kate and I a great spiritual lift. It will also raise the awareness of missing and abused children generally. We continue to pray that someone will provide the key information that leads us to Madeleine.
2007-05-28 00:45:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Pope, like numerous different character interior the worldwide, has a constrained on a daily basis schedule to fulfill with human beings. His assembly with the mothers and fathers of a lacking female grow to be purely an exception.
2016-10-08 23:49:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by catanzaro 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, the McCanns are not having a private audience with the Pope.
Secondly: innocent until proven guilty. Yes, their behaviour has been strange. Yes, I'd agree they were negligent in leaving those children alone. But the fact is that nobody knows what happened to her. For all we know, she wandered out of the room on her own and met with a terrible accident.
2007-05-28 00:38:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure if they deliberately killed the child. But, I'm with you about the Pope visit. I just can't believe the POPE is getting involved with this. Let the parents, of troops who have died fighting for our freedom, meet with the Pope. Not some media seeking professionals, who haven't an ounce of common sense.
2007-05-28 00:33:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by janice 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont know if they killed her or if their actions lead to her death - she is probably dead but I guess until someone finds a body no-one will know for sure.
I dont get why the pope is meeting w them though - most negligent parents get visits from child protective and the police not the pope - money talks.
2007-05-28 00:41:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by jillmarie2000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since you've already tried, judged & passed your verdict, your question is pointless. Honestly, have you no mercy?
Granted, it is odd (to say the least) that they are meeting the Holy Father instead of searching every noon & cranny but each to his own...If it does give them strength, i don't think anyone should judge them. Like i said earlier, they are already condemned for life.
2007-05-28 00:39:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Faith 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Pope knows a good publicity opportunity when he sees one.
2007-05-28 00:39:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They did not kill her. If you mean figuratively - still not, as I think that it is all about the abductor, not so much for the fact that they left them alone.
If he hadn't taken her then and there, it would have been another time and another place, for sure.
2007-05-28 00:35:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by S from Dublin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You don't know that for a fact. Has the parents already been tried already? You have already convicted them in your own mind.
2007-05-28 00:34:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by WC 7
·
1⤊
0⤋