thought it a bit odd that they waited for any lenght of time to show recent photo, was this up to them or does the police have a say in what photos are shown and when
2007-05-27 21:51:39 · 19 answers · asked by dollyk 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Because some things are precious and private god forbid that child never comes back alive they will have something that has not been public property. There are plenty of recent pictures out there
2007-05-27 22:03:52 · answer #1 · answered by emma g 3 · 0⤊ 7⤋
They seem to be drip feeding information to the public in order to extend the interest as long as possible,
Thats all fine and good but to me its playing games with Madeliene's life.
What if these photos that have just been released would have jogged someones memory weeks ago because the time they were taken and the time they were released would have been just days apart. Now they are releasing a photo and expecting people to try and think back on a non significant event like children playing in a park from almost a month ago.
Seems to me like it would have been a far better idea to get all the information in the public domain as soon as possible while its all fresh in peoples minds.
Not sit there in a room going, OK these photos can be for the Sunday papers. We'll hold on to this other bit of information till Monday so we have something for next weeks papers.
2007-05-27 22:30:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 2⤋
As they want to keep the headlines going suppose they are now having the last film printed and then getting the latest pictures printed by the press. Personally I think they have over pubicised the whole issue and the public are getting somewhat tired of what the McCann's do every day - including the latest 'scoop' of visiting the Pope. Maybe after a donation from him as well.
2007-05-27 21:56:24 · answer #3 · answered by SYJ 5 · 8⤊ 0⤋
Something is not adding up to this story. There is defnitely an hidden agenda along the way. Why, if the parents have done wrong, why are they being treated like royalty. They are having better treatment than what Princess Diana ever had.
2007-05-27 22:38:20 · answer #4 · answered by CT 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Alittle bit of new info every day keeps the media and public interested! They probably have even more in store ready to show the Pope.
2007-05-27 22:56:37 · answer #5 · answered by garfish 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well with all the media around they could do what they want through the media so god knows what they were thinking. Its all come too late i fear? God forgive these parents for what they have put their daughter through. Unfortunetly they'll probably never have to answer to why they left their precious children alone.
2007-05-27 22:05:52 · answer #6 · answered by valentine 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
They are probably holding onto them so they have something in reserve when the story dies down, then they can release 'never before seen' photos etc and gain more headlines.
2007-05-27 22:21:46 · answer #7 · answered by georgeygirl 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Well whatever the reason, I would find it hard to believe they don't have digital cameras and therefore would have no need to get them developed!
2007-05-27 23:38:54 · answer #8 · answered by groovymaude 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No chrgea against them but if it was in this country and they were normal people and not docs they would have been hung out to dry
2007-05-27 22:29:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Probably because that photo could not be airbrushed to make her look cherubic...
2007-05-28 00:22:13 · answer #10 · answered by triptipper 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
JIFL...How hard is it to understand that it is the parents fault?
Did I miss something?...was it someone else who left them all alone in vulnerable positions?
Fire, chocking, abducting?
2007-05-27 22:12:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 0⤋